Case Summary (G.R. No. L-16370)
Factual Background
Jose S. Galvez was an employee of the Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company from December 1, 1908 until operations were interrupted on December 31, 1941, totaling 33 years and one month of prewar service. He was reinstated on April 1, 1945 and served until his death on February 7, 1951, adding five years, ten months and six days of post-liberation service, and aggregating 38 years, 11 months and six days. The Company had adopted an Employees' Pension Plan in 1923, from which pension and death benefits were payable.
Prejudgment Payments and Initial Claimants' Suit
In 1951 Gracia Vda. de Galvez received P24,000 from the Company as pension and death benefits due to the deceased under the Employees' Pension Plan. Later in 1951, Crispin Jeturian and about 63 other prewar employees filed a proceeding in the Court of Industrial Relations for collection of their proportionate shares in the discontinued pension plan, which the Company had purported to terminate by a Board resolution of November 6, 1945, retroactive to January 1, 1942.
Decisions in Jeturian Proceedings and Examiner's Report
The Court of Industrial Relations rendered a decision on February 23, 1954 in Case No. 639-V directing payment to the petitioners of their proportionate shares and severance pay in specified cases. That decision was affirmed by the Supreme Court in Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. vs. Jeturian, et al., G.R. No. L-7756, on June 20, 1955. The Court of Industrial Relations later appointed a chief examiner to liquidate the prewar pension fund; the examiner's report was approved by the Court on May 12, 1956, identifying all prewar employees entitled to participation and specifying amounts, including a P13,028.64 share for Jose S. Galvez among other nonpetitioners whose aggregate share totaled P23,381.96.
Order of January 8, 1959 and Subsequent Affirmations
Nonpetitioners, including Gracia Vda. de Galvez as representative of the deceased, sought enforcement of the examiner's report. Despite opposition by the Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company, the Court of Industrial Relations issued an order dated January 8, 1959 directing the Company to deposit P23,381.96 for the nonpetitioners, exclusive of service fee. That order was affirmed by the Court of Industrial Relations sitting en banc in a resolution dated February 14, 1959. The Company sought relief in this Court by certiorari in G.R. No. L-15120, but this Court dismissed the petition by resolution dated March 17, 1959 for lack of merit, rendering the January 8, 1959 order executory.
Company Petition and Court of Industrial Relations' Modification
On April 14, 1959 the Company petitioned the Court of Industrial Relations to relieve it from depositing the P13,028.64 attributed to Jose S. Galvez on the ground that Gracia Vda. de Galvez had already been paid P24,000 in 1951 and that the Rules of the plan would have limited post-liberation awards to six or twelve months' pay depending on length of service. By order dated September 8, 1959 the Court of Industrial Relations concluded that Jose S. Galvez was entitled to P13,028.64 for prewar service and P12,000 for post-liberation service, an aggregate of P25,028.64; because P24,000 had been previously paid to the widow, the Court ordered the Company to deposit only P1,028.64. The Court explained that it believed it could in its discretion alter or modify an award during its effectivity to correct an error and accord substantial justice.
Present Petition and Issue for Review
Gracia Vda. de Galvez filed for review by certiorari of the September 8, 1959 order, contending that the lower court unlawfully amended the January 8, 1959 order which had become final and executory. The central legal issue presented was whether the Court of Industrial Relations could lawfully alter an executory order and reduce the deposit previously directed for the benefit of a nonpetitioner whose share had been fixed in the examiner's report and included in the Court's prior order.
The Supreme Court's Ruling
The Supreme Court held that the Court of Industrial Relations lacked authority to alter or modify its January 8, 1959 order after that order had been affirmed en banc and after this Court had dismissed a certiorari petition challenging it, thereby rendering it final and executory. The Court set aside the September 8, 1959 order. The Court directed that within thirty days from entry of judgment the sum of P13,028.64, exclusive of service fee, be deposited by the Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company with the Court of Industrial Relations for the benefit of the heirs of Jose S. Galvez, with costs against the respondent.
Legal Reasoning and Authorities
The Court reasoned that equitable considerations cannot overcome the public policy and public interest that require finality in judicial and quasi-judicial determinations. Allowing alteration of decisions or final orders that have become executory would nullify the ro
...continue reading
Case Syllabus (G.R. No. L-16370)
Parties and Posture
- Gracia Vda. de Galvez appeared as petitioner in her capacity as widow and heir of Jose S. Galvez.
- Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company and the Court of Industrial Relations appeared as respondents.
- The case reached the Supreme Court by an appeal by certiorari from an order of the Court of Industrial Relations dated September 8, 1959.
- The petitioner sought review of the lower court's order on the ground that it unlawfully altered a prior final and executory order.
Facts
- Jose S. Galvez served the Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company from December 1, 1908 to December 31, 1941, and from April 1, 1945 to February 7, 1951, totaling thirty-eight years, eleven months, and six days of service.
- The Company adopted an Employees' Pension Plan on September 18, 1923.
- In 1951 Gracia Vda. de Galvez received P24,000 from the Company as pension and death benefits for her deceased husband.
- On December 22, 1951, Crispin Jeturian and about sixty-three prewar employees filed a proceeding in the Court of Industrial Relations seeking distribution of the discontinued pension plan, which the Company had purported to discontinue by a November 6, 1945 resolution made retroactive to January 1, 1942.
- On February 23, 1954 the Court of Industrial Relations directed payment of respective proportionate shares in the pension plan and, as to some, one-month severance pay; this decision was affirmed by the Supreme Court in Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. vs. Jeturian, et al., G. R. No. Lr-7756, June 20, 1955.
- The Court of Industrial Relations ordered liquidation of the prewar pension plan and, by order dated May 12, 1956, approved the examiner's report listing entitlements including an unclaimed aggregate of P23,381.96 and Jose S. Galvez's share of P13,028.64.
- By order dated January 8, 1959 the Court of Industrial Relations directed the Company to deposit P23,381.96 for the non-petitioners named in the examiner's report, a decision affirmed en banc on February 14, 1959 and whose certiorari review was dismissed by the Supreme Court on March 17, 1959.
- The Company petitioned the Court of Industrial Relations on April 14, 1959 to excuse it from depositing Jose S. Galvez's P13,028.64 on the theory that the P24,000 earlier paid to his widow covered pension and death benefits and effectively exceeded the P12,000 post-liberation pension entitlement under plan rules.
- By order of September 8, 1959 the Court of Industrial Relations held that Jose S. Galvez was entitled to P13,028.64 for prewar service and P12,000 for post-liberation service, for an aggregate of P25,028.64, and ordered the Company to deposit the net balance of P1,028.64, concluding that the court could modify its prior order to prevent injustice.
Procedural History
- The examiner's report was approved by the Court of Industrial Relations on May 12, 1956.
- The Court of Industrial Relations ordered deposit for non-petitioners by order dated January 8, 1959, which was affirmed en banc on February 14, 1959.
- The Company filed a petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court docketed as G. R. No. L-15120, which was dismissed on March 17, 1959.
- The Company filed a new petition in the Court of Industrial Rel