Title
G.G. Sportswear Mfg. Corp. vs. World Class Properties, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 182720
Decision Date
Mar 2, 2010
GG Sportswear sought rescission and refund from World Class over a condominium purchase, citing delays and financial issues. The Supreme Court ruled against rescission, finding no breach, as World Class obtained necessary permits and completed the project within the allowed timeframe.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 172635)

Background and Agreement Terms

G.G. Sportswear Mfg. Corp. entered into a Reservation Agreement with World Class Properties to purchase a penthouse unit and parking slots at the Global Business Tower located in Ortigas Center, Pasig City, for a total price of PHP 89,624,272.82. The Agreement required various payments, including a downpayment and additional monthly installments. Significant provisions included the stipulation that failure to pay any installment would allow World Class to impose a 3% monthly interest rate on unpaid amounts or rescind the Agreement without court action, potentially forfeiting the reservation fee.

Payment History and Issues Arising

GG Sportswear made timely payments from May to December 1996, totaling PHP 19,717,339.50, which represented 21% of the total purchase price. In January 1997, GG Sportswear requested the return of checks for replacement, leading to discussions about a new Reservation Agreement. Despite the intention to defer payments due to financial difficulties, World Class insisted on payment and later delivered a provisional Contract to Sell that included a completion date for the project.

Dispute and Claims for Refund

Discontented with the stated completion date and feeling that the Agreement lacked essential terms, GG Sportswear filed a complaint with the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB) seeking a refund of payments made due to World Class’s purported contractual breach. World Class denied any wrongdoing, suggesting instead that GG Sportswear's dissatisfaction stemmed from its own financial struggles.

HLURB Findings and Board Rulings

An HLURB Arbiter found that World Class violated P.D. No. 957 by entering the Agreement without the required Certificate of Registration and License to Sell (CR/LS), leading to the rescission of the Agreement and an order for World Class to refund the installment payments with interest. Upon appeal, the HLURB Board modified the Arbiter's ruling, asserting that since a License to Sell was acquired before the complaint, the rescission claim on that basis was no longer valid but still allowed for a refund based on failure to deliver as promised.

Court of Appeals Decision

The Court of Appeals reversed the ruling of the Office of the President that favored GG Sportswear, contending that the Board's findings had attain finality, and emphasized that the presence of a CR/LS at the time the complaint was filed barred rescission. Additionally, no material breach occurred since the completion date was either undisputed or evolved as per subsequent agreements.

Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeals' decision, concluding that rescission was unwarranted because GG Sportswear failed to demonstrate substantial breach of contract justifying such relief. The issues r

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.