Title
Francisco vs. Francisco-Alfonso
Case
G.R. No. 138774
Decision Date
Mar 8, 2001
Aida, Gregorio's legitimate daughter, contested a forged deed of sale favoring his illegitimate children, alleging simulation and violation of her legitime. Courts ruled the sale void, upholding her rightful inheritance.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 138774)

Factual Background

On August 15, 1983, Gregorio Francisco allegedly executed a deed of absolute sale, transferring two parcels of land to his illegitimate daughters, Regina Francisco and Zenaida Pascual, for the sum of P25,000.00. After Gregorio's death on July 20, 1990, Aida, upon learning about this purported sale, contested its validity, claiming that the signature on the deed was a forgery. In response, the petitioners denied this allegation and contended that the sale was legitimate.

Proceedings in Regional Trial Court

On April 1, 1991, Aida filed a complaint with the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Bulacan to annul the sale. The RTC ruled in favor of the petitioners on July 21, 1994, upholding the validity of the sale and dismissing Aida's complaint for lack of merit. The decision primarily rested on the credibility of the transaction and the absence of evidence supporting Aida's claims.

Appeal to the Court of Appeals

Following the RTC's dismissal, Aida appealed to the Court of Appeals. On April 30, 1999, the appellate court reversed the RTC's decision, declaring the deed of sale null and void from the beginning. The court found the transaction to be a simulation intended to deprive Aida, the legitimate daughter, of her inheritance rights.

Supreme Court Review and Jurisdiction

The primary issue before the Supreme Court was whether it could review the factual findings of the Court of Appeals. The jurisdiction under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court restricts the Supreme Court’s review to questions of law, not to re-evaluation of evidence unless there is compelling reason to do so.

Findings of Fact and Conclusion

The Supreme Court affirmed the findings of the Court of Appeals, which concluded that the deed of sale lacked consideration and thus was a simulation. The testimonies of the petitioners regarding their financial capability to purchase the property were deemed incredible. Further, the transaction violated the provisions of the Civil Code regarding the legitime of the legitimate child, as it effectively denied Aida her rightful share in her father's estate.

Legal Provisions and Implications

Under Article 888 of the Civil Code, Aida, as the sole legitimate child, was entitled to half of t

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.