Title
Food Terminal Inc. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 108397
Decision Date
Jun 21, 2000
FTI failed to maintain required temperature in refrigerated storage, causing spoilage of Basic Foods' yeast. Court ruled FTI negligent, liable for damages under Civil Code.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 258130)

Applicable Law

The relevant legal framework includes provisions of the Civil Code concerning obligations, particularly Articles 1170 and 1173, and established jurisprudence regarding warehouse agreements and the standard of care required by warehousemen.

Facts of the Case

Basic Foods Corporation was engaged in manufacturing food products and required cold storage for its Red Star compressed yeast. It deposited 1,770 cartons of this yeast with Food Terminal Incorporated's refrigerated warehouse located in Taguig, Metro Manila, between June 10 and June 23, 1987. Due to alleged negligence by FTI in maintaining the appropriate storage temperature, 383.6 cartons of the yeast spoiled, resulting in damages valued at P161,112. Basic Foods subsequently demanded compensation from FTI, which was unmet, prompting the legal action.

Respondent's Position

In its answer to the complaint, FTI disputed the claim that Basic Foods deposited 1,770 cartons, asserting that only 750 cartons were stored. FTI contended that it exercised the utmost diligence required by law to care for the goods, and claimed any deterioration in quality was due to Basic Foods' negligence or uncontrollable circumstances. FTI indicated it had pre-cooled the area and attempted to maintain the temperature within the specified range through monitoring.

Trial Court Decision

The trial court dismissed Basic Foods' complaint, finding in favor of FTI. It determined that FTI had indeed adhered to its contractual obligations regarding the storage of the yeast.

Court of Appeals Ruling

Basic Foods appealed the trial court's decision to the Court of Appeals, which on December 17, 1992, ruled in favor of Basic Foods, reversing the trial court's decision. The Appellate Court held that FTI exhibited negligence by failing to maintain the required storage conditions, making it liable for the damages incurred by Basic Foods.

Supreme Court Decision

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeals, stating that the issue presented was primarily a factual one, and therefore, the findings of

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.