Title
IN RE: Florencio Mallare
Case
Adm. Case No. 533
Decision Date
Jul 31, 1969
Florencio Mallare, a lawyer, sought to reopen his case after presenting new evidence (baptismal record, affidavits) to prove Filipino citizenship, challenging the Supreme Court's 1968 decision revoking his bar admission. The Court granted a new trial to ensure fairness and due process.
A

Case Summary (Adm. Case No. 533)

Initial Decision and Findings

In the original decision rendered on April 29, 1968, the Court concluded that Florencio Mallare was not a Filipino citizen. Consequently, the decision revoked his admission to the practice of law and mandated the return of his lawyer's diploma. Additionally, it instructed that copies of the decision be sent to the Secretary of Justice and the Local Civil Registrar of Macalelon, Quezon, to document this ruling.

Subsequent Developments and Evidence

Following the denial of various motions for reconsideration by Mallare, he submitted a petition for reopening the case and requested a new trial. The basis for this petition was the discovery of evidence in the Register of Baptisms, asserting that Mallare’s father, Esteban Mallare, was registered as the natural son of Ana Mallare, which could support Mallare's citizenship claim. The petition also included affidavits from individuals who could attest to the legitimacy of the citizenship claim.

Opposition to Reopening by Immigration

The Commissioner of Immigration opposed the request to reopen the case, arguing that the evidence Mallare sought to introduce was not new but rather forgotten knowledge. This stance emphasized the legal standards regarding new evidence in reopening cases, thus framing the argument within the parameters of procedural integrity.

Court's Consideration and Resolution

Despite the opposition, the Court recognized the importance of ensuring that an individual’s citizenship issue, particularly concerning the practice of law, was thoroughly examined. The Court's resolution to grant the request for reopening and a new trial underscored the principle that a member of the bar should have a fair opportunity to substantiate their citizenship claim before being deprived of their professional rights. The new trial would allow all parties to present additional evidence while considering the original investigation's findings as part of the ne

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.