Title
Supreme Court
Fleet Management Services Philippines, Inc. vs. Alejandro G. Lescabo
Case
G.R. No. 268962
Decision Date
Jun 10, 2024
The case involves Lescabo's claim for permanent disability benefits against Fleet Management Services for work-related health issues sustained during service. The court upheld the decision favoring Lescabo, awarding benefits due to insufficient medical assessment from the employer's designated doctors.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 268962)

Background of the Case

Alejandro G. Lescabo has been employed by Fleet Ship Management since 2012, with his last contract beginning in February 2019 as a fitter on the MV Silverstone Express. His job required him to perform numerous strenuous tasks related to the operation, maintenance, and repair of vessel machinery. Lescabo experienced significant health issues while performing his duties, which included fatigue and subsequent hospitalization due to severe conditions, ultimately leading to his medical repatriation.

Medical Evaluation and Diagnosis

Upon returning to the Philippines, Lescabo was evaluated by company-designated physician Dr. Nicomedes G. Cruz, who noted significant health issues, including pneumonia and hyponatremia. On January 20, 2020, after multiple examinations, another physician, Dr. Amado G. Regino, declared Lescabo fit to resume sea duties. Disagreeing with this assessment, Lescabo consulted independent physician Dr. Felix T. Terencio, who asserted that he was unfit for deployment.

Arbitration Process and Claims

Lescabo sought remedies through the National Conciliation Mediation Board and then filed a complaint with a Labor Arbiter, claiming permanent and total disability benefits amounting to USD 60,000, a sickness allowance, and damages from Fleet Ship, arguing that his work conditions led to his health issues. Fleet Ship countered that they properly assessed him as fit for work and that Lescabo failed to comply with the required third-doctor-referral rule.

Decisions of the Labor Arbiter and NLRC

The Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of Lescabo, awarding him disability benefits and sickness allowance. The National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) affirmed this decision after a motion from Fleet Ship, significantly reducing the sickness allowance claim but upholding the disability benefits and adjusting attorney's fees. Fleet Ship subsequently appealed to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals Ruling

The Court of Appeals denied Fleet Ship's petition, agreeing with the NLRC’s findings that a valid, final, and definite assessment was not issued within the required timeframe, leading to a presumption of permanent and total disability for Lescabo. Fleet Ship's arguments concerning compliance with the third-doctor-referral rule were also rejected.

Supreme Court's Analysis

In reviewing the case, the Supreme Court underscored that the crux of Fleet Ship’s argument was factual rather than legal, thereby limiting its review. It emphasized that the medical assessments made by the company's physicians were not defi

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.