Title
Supreme Court
Flauta, Jr. vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 184586
Decision Date
Jul 22, 2009
Election disruption in 2007 led to missing SOVPs; COMELEC nullified flawed proclamations, upheld correction of manifest errors to ensure electoral integrity, affirming true will of voters.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 210905)

Facts of the Case

The events unfolded during the local election canvassing on May 16, 2007, which was disrupted by violence, leading to the unauthorized removal of Statements of Votes by Precinct (SOVP) by members of the Municipal Board of Canvassers. The actions of Melicano Bernan and Julio Collantes resulted in the theft of SOVPs covering a significant portion of the voting precincts. Manganaan filed a request with the COMELEC to nullify the affected SOVPs citing irregularities. Subsequent actions by the SBOC and the proclamation of winning candidates were contested due to these procedural anomalies.

Proceedings Before the COMELEC

In response to Manganaan's petition, Commissioner Brawner issued a memorandum ordering the nullification of certain SOVPs and directed a re-canvassing to ensure the integrity of the elections. Despite this, the SBOC prematurely proclaimed the petitioners as winners before the returning SOVPs could be accounted for, leading to the filing of a Petition to Annul Proclamation by Manganaan. The COMELEC ultimately resolved that the petition should be treated as one for correcting manifest errors in the SOVPs instead of solely a nullification action.

Legal Issues Presented

The central legal issues in the case encompassed whether the COMELEC exercised grave abuse of discretion in its treatment of Manganaan's petition, whether it correctly treated the petition as one to correct manifest errors, whether such a correction could occur post-proclamation, and whether the petitioners' right to due process had been violated.

Developments During Pendency of the Petition

Amid the pendency of the petition, the SBOC reconvened, annulled the initial proclamation, and subsequently proclaimed Manganaan as the duly elected mayor. In turn, Flauta pursued an election protest before the Regional Trial Court. This development raised the question of whether the COMELEC's actions had rendered Manganaan's initial petition moot.

Arguments and Rulings

Petitioners contended that the non-inclusion of Manganaan's petition in the COMELEC's Resolution No. 8212 indicated a dismissal of the case and argued against the propriety of the COMELEC converting the annulment petition to a correction of manifest errors, asserting that such a conversion violated procedural rules post-proclamation. Conversely, Manganaan maintained that his subsequent proclamation rendered the petition moot and emphasized the procedural necessity for correcting manifest errors to uphold the integrity of the election results.

COMELEC’s Powers and Functions

The COMELEC affirmed its authoritative role in supervising and controlling election processes, including the adjustment of proclamations based on election law violations. The Court asserted that the determi

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.