Case Summary (G.R. No. 100898)
Applicable Law and Agreements
The collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between OFC and the Samahang Manggagawa ng Occidental Foundry Corporation-FFW (SAMAHAN) included a "union security clause." It stipulated that employees must maintain their membership in good standing with the union as a condition of continued employment. Specifically, the CBA provision stated that if an employee failed to retain membership in good standing, the company would dismiss the employee upon written request by the union.
Events Leading to Dismissal
On May 6, 1989, petitioners filed a complaint against several union officers for alleged negligence regarding economic demands of the workers. Following a tumultuous internal election and ongoing disputes with the existing leadership, the SAMAHAN expelled the petitioners on September 11, 1989. The following day, the union’s president sent a request to OFC to dismiss the petitioners due to their expulsion from the union. Although the petitioners learned of their dismissal after receiving the official communication from the company, they contended that their termination was without due process.
Labor Arbiter's Decision
Initially, a labor arbiter ruled against the petitioners, affirming that the dismissals were compliant with the CBA. The arbiter held that the company was not required to investigate the reasons behind the union's request for dismissal and concluded that the policy of dismissing employees who fail to maintain union membership was legitimate under the agreement.
NLRC's Affirmation of Arbiter's Decision
The NLRC upheld the labor arbiter's decision. The commission believed that the issue of whether the employees maintained good standing in the union was a matter for the union to handle, not for the employer to question. The NLRC denied the petitioners' motion for reconsideration, leading to the petition for certiorari sought by the petitioners.
Procedural Due Process Violations
The Supreme Court ruled that the manner in which the petitioners were dismissed violated procedural due process. Although the CBA contained provisions necessitating union membership for continued employment, the company did not conduct any form of investigation or allow the petitioners to present their side before their dismissal. The court found that both the SAMAHAN and OFC ignored the necessity of conducting a proper hearing, which the union's own bylaws required for expulsion of members.
Importance of Due Process in Employment Termination
The ruling emphasized that the right of an employee to procedural due process must be respected, regardless of the provisions in a CBA. Employees deserve to be informed of the charges against them and provided an opportunity to defend themselves before any dismissal oc
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 100898)
Case Background
- The case involves a petition for certiorari filed by petitioners Alex Ferrer, Rafael Ferrer, Henry Diaz, Domingo Bancolita, Gil de Guzman, and the Federation of Democratic Labor Unions (FEDLU) against the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) and other parties.
- The petitioners were regular and permanent employees of Occidental Foundry Corporation (OFC) in Malanday, Valenzuela, Metro Manila, under the management of Hui Kam Chang.
- They were dismissed in 1989 after an intraunion dispute within the Samahang Manggagawa ng Occidental Foundry Corporation-FFW (SAMAHAN).
Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)
- A collective bargaining agreement was executed on January 5, 1989, effective from October 1, 1988, to September 30, 1991.
- The CBA included a union security clause mandating employees to maintain good standing membership in the union as a condition for continued employment.
- Article II, Section 3 of the CBA outlined that failure to retain union membership could lead to dismissal upon a written request from the union.
Events Leading to Dismissal
- Petitioners initially filed a complaint against union officers for alleged inattentiveness to workers' economic demands, which was later withdrawn.
- A special election to replace SAMAHAN officers was held, but the newly elected officers faced opposition, leading to a conflict within the union.
- On September 11, 1989, a resolution expelling the petitioners was issued b