Case Summary (G.R. No. L-22212)
Relevant Facts
The shipment of 118 bags of zinc oxide arrived on December 27, 1953, from New York, consigned by P.J. Rhodes & Co. of San Francisco to the petitioner. The goods were marked "Made in U.S.A." and were claimed to qualify as "United States articles" to ensure duty-free entry. Upon inspection, customs officers noted red labels indicating that the goods were produced in a bonded facility, prompting the determination that the shipment was subject to a 20% import duty under the Philippine Tariff Act of 1909. After paying the customs duties under protest, the petitioner sought a refund and cancellation of the forfeiture order regarding the shipment of goods.
Applicable Law
The relevant legal framework is Section 311 of the Bell Trade Act of 1946, which provides for the free entry of United States articles into the Philippines under defined conditions. The law stipulates that in cases where materials are imported into the U.S. to produce items for export, the value of these materials should not exceed 20% of the finished product's value for duty-free entry.
Exemption Requirements
The term "United States article" includes products either wholly developed within the U.S. or those manufactured using materials that meet specified thresholds concerning their value. The customs law requires that exemptions from duty must be strictly construed, placing the burden of proof on the claimant to establish eligibility for duty-free entry.
Evidence and Documentation
The petitioner presented two primary documents to support their claim for duty-free treatment: a certificate of origin from the supplier and a verification of production from the manufacturer. However, these documents failed to conclusively prove that the material used was solely of U.S. origin or that the foreign materials did not exceed the 20% threshold. The Tax Court found the evidence insufficient and ruled that it did not establish the necessary requirements under the Bell Trade Act for exemption from duties.
Customs Law Application
As per Section 1363 of the Revised Administrative Code, the customs authorities determined that the shipment was subject to forfeiture due to fraudulent misdeclaration. The statutes specify conditions under which forfeiture can be enforced, requiring proof of false declarations or fraudulent practices to evade duty obligations.
Determination of Forfeiture
The Tax Court's decision indicated that while the petitioner had prepared the import entry, it did not amount to wrongful making, as the declarations merely reiterated i
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. L-22212)
Case Overview
- The case involves the petitioner, Farm Implement & Machinery Co., who sought the duty-free entry of 118 bags of zinc oxide dry pigment.
- The Customs Collector seized the shipment on grounds of fraudulent misdeclaration as defined in Section 1363 of the Revised Administrative Code.
- Subsequent appeals to the Customs Commissioner and the Tax Court affirmed the seizure and forfeiture of the shipment.
Factual Background
- The shipment arrived on December 27, 1953, from New York, consigned to the petitioner by P.J. Rhodes & Co. of San Francisco.
- The goods were marked "Made in U.S.A." and manufactured by New Jersey Zinc Sales Co. in Palmerton, Pennsylvania.
- Petitioner declared the shipment as "United States articles" to be imported duty-free under Section 311 of the Bell Trade Act.
- Customs officers noted red labels on the packages, indicating prior importation and bond requirements, leading to the conclusion that the goods were subject to a 20% duty under Philippine Tariff Act.
Legal Framework
- Section 311 of the Bell Trade Act: Allowed duty-free entry for U.S. articles until July 3, 1954.
- Defines "United States article" and specifies conditions for exemption from duties based on the percentage of foreign materials used.
- Philippine Tariff Act: Provides guidelines for assessing duties on imported goods based on market value at the time of exportation.
Customs Law Application
- Exemptions from customs duties are strictly construed; the burd