Title
Farinas vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. L-52431
Decision Date
Jul 30, 1981
Rodolfo Farinas, disqualified by Comelec for turncoatism, won as mayor; SC ruled due process violated, remanded case for proper hearing despite his proclamation.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-55413)

Facts of the Case

On January 4, 1980, Farinas filed a certificate of candidacy with the election registrar of Laoag City for the position of mayor under the Nacionalista Party. Later that same day, he filed another certificate of candidacy with the Comelec indicating he was running as the official KBL candidate and withdrew his earlier candidacy. On January 8, 1980, Ernesto T. Farinas confirmed Rodolfo as the KBL's candidate for mayor. On January 20, 1980, Laoag City was declared a free zone for the KBL, leading Antonio F. Lazo to file a petition for disqualification against Farinas for his dual candidacy.

Proceedings Before Comelec

Antonio F. Lazo submitted a petition for disqualification against Farinas on January 20, 1980, which was served to Farinas. Farinas submitted an unverified answer on January 25, 1980, and a verified answer on January 28, 1980, the same day the Comelec heard the case. The Comelec issued Resolution No. 8547, disqualifying Farinas on the grounds of "turncoatism" and engaging in partisan political activities prior to the campaign, citing relevant Presidential Decrees.

Election Outcome

Despite the Comelec's disqualification resolution, Farinas was proclaimed the winner of the mayoral election on February 6, 1980, with a margin of 6,419 votes over Lazo. This proclamation occurred after the Comelec lifted its suspension order.

Motion to Withdraw Petition

On February 13, 1980, Farinas filed a motion to withdraw his petition against the Comelec's resolution, arguing that it had become moot due to his proclamation as mayor. The Comelec, through the Solicitor General, and Lazo expressed that the case was not moot despite the proclamation.

Court's Direction for Reevaluation

The court determined that the previous hearing before Comelec was inadequate to thoroughly examine the facts of the case due to its summary nature. It noted that the parties were not provided with a proper opportunity to present their cases or to submit memoranda. The court's

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.