Title
Fantastico vs. Malicse, Sr.
Case
G.R. No. 190912
Decision Date
Jan 12, 2015
A drunken confrontation escalated into a violent group assault, leading to Attempted Murder charges. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, citing abuse of superior strength and intent to kill, modifying penalties and ordering damages.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 190912)

Factual Background

The conflict began when Elpidio confronted his sister Isabelita, leading to verbal exchanges with her son Winston. After initial reconciliation attempts failed, Elpidio returned to Isabelita's house, where he was met with hostility from her sons and son-in-law, including physical attacks from Salvador and Gary. The altercation escalated as Salvador struck Elpidio with a rattan stick, and Gary assaulted him with a tomahawk axe, resulting in severe injuries after he was joined by other aggressors, including Rolando Villanueva, who hit Elpidio with a lead pipe.

Criminal Information Filed

Following the incident, an information was filed charging all aggressors, including petitioners, with attempted murder as defined under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the accused had acted in concert with the intent to kill, despite not completing the act of murder due to circumstances outside their control.

Trial and Verdict in RTC

The RTC, after hearing testimonies and evaluating evidence, acquitted several accused but found Fantastico and Villanueva guilty of attempted murder. They were sentenced to an indeterminate penalty of imprisonment and ordered to pay actual and moral damages to the victim. The basis for conviction included the violent and coordinated manner in which the attack was executed.

Appeal to the Court of Appeals

Petitioners appealed the trial court's decision, raising multiple arguments against the findings. They contended that the CA and RTC had erroneous conclusions based on factual misinterpretations, asserting that the information lacked essential elements of the crime of attempted murder and that treachery, a qualifying circumstance, was absent.

Sufficient Allegation of Crime Elements

The court determined that the essential elements of attempted murder had been sufficiently alleged in the information filed, particularly that they commenced the act with overt acts but failed to complete the task due to external circumstances. This is aligned with the provisions outlined in the Revised Penal Code regarding the nature of attempts at committing a felony.

Evaluation of Intent to Kill

The presence of intent to kill was established through the nature of the assault, the weapons used, and the behavior of the attackers. The testimonial evidence indicated that the acts exhibited malice and a deliberate attempt to inflict serious harm upon Elpidio. The absence of treachery was also examined, concluding that the spontaneous and reactionary nature of the attack did not satisfy the criteria for such aggravation.

Findings on Abuse of Superior Strength

The court found that abuse of superior strength was appropriately established in this case, as the aggressors were armed and outnumbered Elpidio, who was incapacitated due to intoxication. This consideration was central to the sentencing as it proved the clear disparity betwee

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.