Case Summary (G.R. No. 188144)
Factual Background
F.F. Cruz brought its fleet, comprising the tugboat M/T "Imma," Barge 609, Barge 1001, and Barge Piling Rig "Pilipino," to the construction site of a government pier. On the same day, the tugboat M/T "Jasaan," owned by Anchor Metals Corporation (AMC) and chartered from Philippine Iron Construction and Marine Works, came to tow another vessel, Barge "Florida." The rapid approach of the typhoon led to significant maritime damage—F.F. Cruz's Barge 609 and Pilipino sank, while Barge 1001 collided with driven piles at the construction site, leading to this litigation.
Legal Proceedings and Findings
After the incident, a marine protest was filed, leading to investigations by the Board of Marine Inquiry (BMI) and the Philippine Coast Guard. The BMI absolved AMC and PICMW from administrative liability, attributing fault instead to F.F. Cruz for failing to secure its vessels adequately. F.F. Cruz subsequently filed a complaint for damages against AMC and PICMW in the Regional Trial Court (RTC), which found clear liability on the part of AMC for the damage caused to F.F. Cruz’s vessels.
Court of Appeals Decision
On appeal, the Court of Appeals upheld the RTC's findings that AMC was liable for damages, but reduced its liability based on F.F. Cruz’s contributory negligence. The CA noted that F.F. Cruz did not secure its vessels properly during the typhoon, which contributed to the damage they sustained. The CA also ruled that PICMW was not liable because the charter arrangement positioned AMC as the effective owner of the vessels during the voyage.
Supreme Court's Review Parameters
The Supreme Court consolidated the petitions for review and ruled that it operates under a limited scope of review restricted to questions of law, emphasizing that factual findings of the Court of Appeals are generally conclusive. The Court rejected the petitions, asserting that F.F. Cruz and AMC did not meet the threshold required to overturn the CA’s factual findings, particularly those related to contributory negligence and the handling of the vessels during the storm.
Analysis of Negligence
The Supreme Court highlighted that contributory negligence was appropriately assigned to F.F. Cruz due to its failure to ensure that its vessels were secured in anticipation of the typhoon. The BMI report sub
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 188144)
Case Overview
- Case Citation: 817 Phil. 392
- Date: August 30, 2017
- Parties Involved:
- Petitioner: F.F. Cruz & Company, Inc.
- Respondents: Philippine Iron Construction and Marine Works, Inc. (PICMW) and/or Anchor Metals Corp. (AMC)
- Nature of the Case: Consolidated petitions for review on certiorari challenging the Decision and Resolution of the Court of Appeals regarding liability for damages caused to F.F. Cruz's barges.
Background of the Case
- F.F. Cruz was contracted by the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) to construct a government pier in Brooke’s Point, Palawan.
- In September 1988, F.F. Cruz deployed its vessels to the construction site, including tugboat M/T "Imma" and several barges.
- On November 4, 1988, a typhoon named Welpring struck Brooke’s Point, resulting in significant damage to F.F. Cruz's vessels, including the sinking of Barge 609 and the collision of Barge 1001 with construction piles.
- AMC owned Barge "Florida," which was being towed by tugboat M/T "Jasaan," also involved in the incident.
Incident Description
- The incident occurred during the typhoon, as both F.F. Cruz's and AMC's vessels were affected by adverse weather conditions.
- The tugboat Jasaan, while towing Florida, faced issues when the rudder cable snapped, causing both vessels to drift toward the shore.
- As a result of this drift, a m