Title
Exconde vs. Capuno
Case
G.R. No. L-10134
Decision Date
Jun 29, 1957
A 15-year-old minor caused a fatal jeep accident during a parade. The Supreme Court held both the minor and his father jointly liable for damages, emphasizing parental responsibility under Article 1903 of the Spanish Civil Code.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 133064)

Facts of the Case

Dante Capuno, then fifteen years old and a Boy Scouts member and elementary student, negligently drove a jeep during a school parade commemorating Dr. Jose Rizal. The jeep overturned, resulting in the deaths of two passengers, including Isidoro Caperina, son of Sabina Exconde. Dante was criminally found guilty of double homicide through reckless imprudence. Sabina reserved her right to file a separate civil action for damages, which she pursued against both Dante and his father, Delfin Capuno, claiming joint and several liability for the damages due to Dante being a minor living with his father. The defendants contended that only Dante should be liable since he was not under his father’s control or custody at the time. The lower court absolved Delfin Capuno of civil liability and held only Dante liable. Sabina Exconde appealed.

Issue

Whether Delfin Capuno could be held civilly liable, jointly and severally with his son Dante, for damages resulting from the death of Isidoro Caperina caused by Dante’s negligent act when Dante was a minor living with his father.

Legal Framework

The case involves interpretation of Article 1903 of the Spanish Civil Code, which imposes civil liability on:

  1. Parents for damages caused by their minor children living with them;
  2. Teachers or directors of arts and trades for damages caused by their pupils or apprentices under their custody.

Articles 154 and 155 authorize parental authority over minor children, including the duty to support, keep, educate, instruct, and correct them moderately. This parental authority entails civil liability for damages caused by minors living with their parents, unless the parents can prove they exercised due diligence.

Court’s Analysis

The Court emphasized that Dante Capuno was a minor living with his father, Delfin Capuno, at the time of the negligent act resulting in the deaths. It reinforced that parental liability arises from the duty of care and supervision emanating from parental authority, which includes supporting, educating, and correcting the child.

The Court distinguished the provision imposing liability on “teachers or directors of arts and trades” by clarifying that it applies only to arts and trades institutions, not to academic educational institutions. Dante, being a student of an elementary school (an academic institution), and attending a parade under instruction of the City School Supervisor, does not fall under the scope of this provision. The Court noted doctrinal authority and prior jurisprudence supporting this distinction.

Therefore, the Court concluded that Delfin Capuno is liable jointly and severally with his son because at the time of the incident, Dante was a minor living with his father, which triggers the presumption of parental liability under Article 1903. The father could avoid liability only by proving the exercise of sufficient vigilance, which he failed to do.

Court’s Ruling

The Court modified the lower court’s decision, holding Delfin Capuno jointly and severally liable with his son, Dante Capuno, to pay the plaintiff damages amounting to P2,959.00, including costs of the action.

Dissenting Opinion

Justice Reyes dissented, arguing that Article 1903’s reference to “teachers or heads of establishments of arts and trades” should encompass all teachers, including those in academic institutions, because there is no substantial difference regarding their duty of supervision over pupils. He construed the phrase to mean that when a parent entrusts a minor child to the custody of competent school authorities, the liability for damages committed by the child while under such custody shifts to those authorities, not to the parent.

Justice Reyes po

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.