Title
Ex Parte Arcenas
Case
G.R. No. 1708
Decision Date
Aug 24, 1905
A will executed by a testator unable to sign was invalidated as a witness signed on his behalf without writing the testator's name, failing to meet legal formalities under Section 618 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 191705)

Applicable Law

This case is governed by the Code of Civil Procedure of the Philippines, specifically Section 618, which outlines the requirements for valid wills. The Code of Civil Procedure came into effect on October 1, 1901, making it the relevant legal framework for assessing the validity of the will in question.

Factual Background

On October 12, 1901, Jose de los Santos executed a will in the presence of witnesses and a notary but failed to sign it due to ill health. Instead, witness Naval A. Vidal signed on his behalf upon the testator's request. Following the execution of the will, one of the executors, Pedro Arcenas, sought its probate in the Court of First Instance. Despite proper notice, no opposition was raised against the probate.

Judicial Proceedings

The Court of First Instance examined witnesses Sandalio Garcia and Andres Protasio, who confirmed that the will was executed voluntarily by the testator, although it remained unsigned by him. The heirs petitioned the court to investigate the notary and witness regarding the authenticity of the will. However, the court ultimately disallowed the will based on the absence of the testator’s signature, navigating through the legal mandates set forth in Section 618 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legal Analysis

Section 618 of the Code requires that a will be written and signed by the testator or someone acting on behalf of the testator in their presence and by their express direction. Given that Jose de los Santos did not sign the will, the court found it invalid as it did not conform to the strictly mandated requirements. The previous provision from the Civil Code, which permitted an attesting witness to sign on behalf of an incapacitated testator with appropriate certification, had been amended, making the current requirements more stringent.

Conclusion and Affirmation of Lower Court's Decision

The

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.