Title
Supreme Court
EMS Crew Management Philippines vs. Bauzon
Case
G.R. No. 205385
Decision Date
Apr 26, 2021
Seafarer Bauzon diagnosed with Papillary Cancer deemed work-related; awarded permanent disability benefits, sickness allowance, and attorney's fees.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 205385)

Employment Relationship

On September 24, 2009, EMS Crew Management Philippines hired Erwin C. Bauzon as an Able Seaman for the vessel M/T D. Elephant with an approved contract by the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA) and a Collective Bargaining Agreement that includes provisions for the benefits of seafarers. Prior to embarking, Bauzon successfully underwent a Pre-Employment Medical Examination (PEME), certifying him as fit for sea duty.

Medical Issues and Treatment

While working aboard the M/T D. Elephant, Bauzon developed severe throat pain that led to difficulty swallowing. Despite reporting his condition to the ship master, who advised him to complete his contract, he requested medical repatriation due to his persistent symptoms. Subsequently, on August 2, 2010, Bauzon was repatriated to the Philippines and visited EMS Phils. for his medical condition, triggering a series of medical assessments which eventually diagnosed him with various thyroid issues, culminating in a surgical procedure.

Diagnosis of Papillary Cancer

After undergoing multiple medical evaluations and surgeries, including a bilateral thyroidectomy, Bauzon's final diagnosis by a private physician, Dr. Manuel C. Jacinto, Jr., was Papillary Cancer, which rendered him unfit for any sea duty. Following this, he filed a complaint against the petitioners seeking disability benefits, medical reimbursements, and other compensatory measures.

Labor Arbiter’s Decision

On June 28, 2011, the Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of Bauzon, ordering the petitioners to compensate him with substantial monetary awards for permanent total disability benefits and sickness wages, alongside attorney’s fees. This led to an appeal by the petitioners to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC).

NLRC and Court of Appeals Rulings

The NLRC upheld the Labor Arbiter’s decision on December 23, 2011, reinforcing the findings that Bauzon’s conditions were work-related. The NLRC's ruling concluded that the physical ailments leading to his diagnosis were attributable to the nature of his employment. The petitioners' subsequent motion for reconsideration was denied.

Petitioners later appealed to the Court of Appeals, raising concerns about the conclusions drawn by the NLRC. The appellate court upheld the lower court’s decision on August 31, 2012, affirming that Bauzon's ailment, Papillary Cancer, was indeed work-related due to his exposure to dangerous working conditions as a seaman.

Main Legal Issues

The petitioners contested whether the Court of Appeals erred in determining the compensability of Bauzon’s illness, invoking precedents regarding the burden of proof on the seafarer to establish a causal connection between employment and illness. They also contended that Bauzon, not having been medically repatriated under the stipulated guidelines, should not be entitled to sickness allowance.

Supreme Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court ultimately denied the petition, affirming that Bauzon’s Papillary Cancer could be considered compensable based on existing labor standards governing employment for seafarers.

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.