Title
Elgar vs. Santos, Jr.
Case
A.M. No. MTJ-16-1880
Decision Date
Feb 4, 2020
Judge Santos pressured complainant to settle, delayed proceedings, issued improper orders, and failed to follow mediation rules, resulting in fines for misconduct and inefficiency.

Case Summary (A.M. No. MTJ-16-1880)

Allegations and Complaints

In her verified Complaint-Affidavit submitted on January 17, 2013, Elgar claimed that her husband left two parcels of agricultural land through a Deed of Donation Mortis Causa on August 18, 1999. She filed a petition on January 7, 2010, for the allowance of this deed. The initial hearing had significant developments, primarily influenced by the actions and encouragements of Judge Santos for the involved parties to reach an amicable settlement. Elgar alleged that due to Judge Santos’s persistent pressure to settle, there was a hindrance to the proper proceedings of the case.

Overview of Respondent's Actions

Judge Santos actively sought an amicable resolution, sending numerous messages to Elgar's counsel advocating for settlement and initiating frequent discussions regarding possible settlements within and outside the court. On several occasions, he proposed specific terms and urged the parties to bring any necessary co-heirs, causing Elgar to feel that his actions were beyond his authority and jurisdiction, particularly given the ex parte communications he had facilitated and his overbearing insistence on settlement.

Findings of the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA)

The Office of the Court Administrator submitted a report on September 17, 2015, determining that while some of Judge Santos's actions were not administratively liable, he was nevertheless guilty of attempting to enforce an amicable settlement in a manner that impaired the expediency of the case resolution. The OCA found fault with his undue delays in the proceedings, which extended from January 7, 2010, when the petition was filed, until its withdrawal on December 11, 2012, without progressing beyond pre-trial.

Judicial Conduct Violations Found

Ultimately, the OCA concluded that Judge Santos had violated several canons of the New Code of Judicial Conduct. Although he was not held liable for failing to limit his inquiry to the deed's validity or for requiring information on properties that were outside the petition's scope, he was held culpable for his insistence on producing an amicable settlement and for issuing an Extended Order directed towards Elgar’s counsel after the petition had been withdrawn, which was deemed uncalled for.

Court's Ruling and Sanctions

The court partly adopted the findings of the OCA, affirming Santos's lack of administrative liability for some actions, while determining he was guilty of other misconduct. A significant sanction was imposed—a cumulative fine amounting to P

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.