Title
El Pueblo de Filipinas vs. Revilla
Case
G.R. No. L-1060
Decision Date
Mar 17, 1949
Four armed men broke into a Manila home in 1946, robbed the couple, raped the wife, and were convicted based on confessions and victim identification.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-1060)

Summary of Charges

The accused were charged with robbery in band in a dwelling, committed with violence, intimidation, and with the additional crime of rape. The trial court sentenced each of the accused to a penalty of reclusion perpetua, required them to indemnify the victim Amparo Santiago in the amount of P500, and ordered them to return the stolen items or, if unable, to pay their total value of P289.50, without imprisonment in case of insolvency, plus the costs of the trial.

Factual Background

The robbery occurred early in the morning when Porfirio Lapena was outside his home. The accused, armed with firearms and knives, forced their way in, threatened the occupants, and demanded money. After threatening Amparo Santiago, Sergio Revilla forcibly took her to another room where he committed rape, followed by his co-accused. The police later arrested the accused and recovered stolen items including jewelry and firearms.

Arrest and Evidence Collection

Police officers responded to reports of theft activities in the area and arrested the accused at a nearby location. Items connected to the robbery were recovered from them, including a .38 caliber revolver, a .45 caliber pistol, and several pieces of stolen property. The accused admitted their involvement in the crime during police questioning.

Victim Testimonies

Amparo Santiago underwent medical examination shortly after the incident, with findings documented by Dr. Angelo Singian. Both Porfirio Lapena and Amparo Santiago identified the accused as the perpetrators, and the connection was further supported by the recovered stolen items.

Defense Claims

The accused presented various defenses, including claims of alibi and allegations of coercive interrogation by police. Sergio Revilla contended that he was at home during the incident, while Diosdado Guinto argued he was elsewhere. However, their testimonies were inconsistent, and claims of torture or coercion were dismissed due to lack of evidence.

Court's Analysis

The trial court found the testimonies and evidence overwhelmingly demonstrated the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecution's case was bolstered by witness identification and the confessions made by t

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.