Title
Dumlao vs. Diaz
Case
G.R. No. L-24476
Decision Date
Sep 30, 1969
A provincial governor challenged his suspension by the President, but the case became moot due to his reelection, term expiration, and legislative changes.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 185757)

Nature of the Petition

The petitioner filed a petition for writs of prohibition and mandamus on April 23, 1965, challenging the legality of an administrative order issued by the Executive Secretary, which suspended Dumlao from office and directed him to relinquish his duties to the Vice-Governor. Dumlao contended that the President's authority to suspend provincial officials, as stated in Section 2078 of the Revised Administrative Code, was limited by Article VII, Section 10(1) of the Philippine Constitution, thereby rendering the suspension arbitrary and oppressive.

Procedural History

The Solicitor-General filed an answer on April 28, 1965, responding to the allegations made by Dumlao. A hearing was subsequently held on April 29, 1965, concerning the preliminary injunction requested by the petitioner to prevent the enforcement of his suspension. Following this, Dumlao filed an urgent motion on May 14, 1965, requesting a resolution on the injunction or a restraining order against the continuation of the investigation by Assistant Solicitor General Torres. On May 17, 1965, the court issued a restraining order and required a comment from the Solicitor-General's Office, which was never filed despite several extensions.

Mootness of the Petition

As of the last recorded action on the case, which included extensions granted for filing memoranda, the significance of the petition diminished due to the change of administration following the national elections of November 1965. The expiration of Dumlao's term at the end of December 1967 further contributed to the case’s mootness. The court observed that Dumlao had been reelected for another four-year term in the November 1967 local elections.

Legal Developments Affecting the Case

Additionally, the principal legal issue concerning the applicability of Section 2078 of the Revised Administrative Code became moot with the enactment of Republic Act 5185, also known as the Decentralization Act of 1967, on September 12, 1967. This change in law further rendered the petition

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.