Title
Development Bank of the Philippines vs. West Negros College, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 152359
Decision Date
Oct 28, 2002
BMC mortgaged properties to DBP, defaulted, and assigned redemption rights to WNC. Dispute arose over redemption price: DBP's charter (total loan balance) vs. Act No. 3135 (auction price + interest). SC ruled in favor of DBP, requiring full loan balance for redemption.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. 152359)

Background of the Case

In December 1967, Bacolod Medical Center secured a loan of PHP 2,400,000.00 from DBP for the construction and operation of a hospital, with the loan secured by a mortgage on the two parcels of land and the intended enhancements. Due to non-payment of the loan, DBP proceeded with an extrajudicial foreclosure, selling the properties at a public auction on 24 August 1989 for PHP 4,090,117.36 while BMC's outstanding balance reached PHP 32,526,133.62.

Redemption Agreement and Issues

Prior to the expiration of the redemption period on 11 July 1991, DBP and BMC agreed on a redemption price of PHP 21,500,000.00. This agreement, subject to approval from DBP's head office, indicated a compromise on the outstanding debt. Following finalizing installment payments, BMC assigned its redemption rights to West Negros College. However, disagreements arose regarding the redemption price, particularly concerning deductions for alleged excessive interest charges.

Court Proceedings

West Negros College initially computed the redemption price based on the stipulations under Section 30, Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, asserting that their payment of PHP 4,300,000.00, with additional interest, sufficed for redemption. However, DBP rejected this calculation, insisting that the entire outstanding loan amount plus interest dictated by the mortgage agreement was necessary for valid redemption.

Ruling of the Trial Court

The Regional Trial Court sided with West Negros College, mandating DBP to surrender the transfer certificates of title based on the assertion that the amount paid fulfilled the redemption requirements. DBP subsequently appealed this ruling to the Court of Appeals, which upheld the trial court's decision.

Supreme Court Decision

In its review, the Supreme Court determined that the redemption of properties mortgaged to DBP, whether foreclosed judicially or extrajudicially, must comply with the specific charter provisions of DBP, which require the mortgagor to pay the total amount owed, including contractual interest as of the date of the sale. The Court emphasized that this obligation is a statutory requirement and prevails over more general laws applicab

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.