Case Summary (G.R. No. 141993)
Factual Background
In 2008, Felicitas L. Domingo filed an administrative complaint against Raul Gatuz for Abuse of Authority and Dishonesty, which led to Administrative Case No. OMB-L-A-08-0126-C. On November 17, 2008, the Ombudsman found Gatuz guilty of Dishonesty and imposed a three-month suspension without pay. The Ombudsman’s decision was indorsed for immediate implementation on May 20, 2009, and received by the DILG on May 29, 2009. Gatuz filed a motion for reconsideration on July 7, 2009, prompting the DILG to defer the decision's implementation.
Procedural History
On October 22, 2009, the DILG issued a memorandum directing the enforcement of Gatuz’s suspension. In response, Gatuz filed a Petition for Declaratory Relief with the RTC, which also sought a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to halt the DILG's implementation of the suspension. The RTC issued a TRO on November 20, 2009, and subsequently declared the DILG's memorandum void on January 18, 2010, thereby preventing the DILG from enforcing the Ombudsman’s decision.
Issues Presented
The DILG contended that the RTC lacked jurisdiction to issue injunctive relief in a declaratory relief action and that the Samaniego ruling regarding the execution of Ombudsman decisions had not yet attained finality due to the ongoing motion for reconsideration. In contrast, Gatuz argued that the RTC was correct in its jurisdiction over the case, citing that the filing of a motion for reconsideration stays the execution of administrative decisions.
Court's Analysis and Ruling
The court determined that the RTC erred in taking cognizance of the petition for declaratory relief, as this was effectively an attempt to contest a quasi-judicial decision made by the Ombudsman, which is outside the RTC's jurisdiction. The court emphasized that actions challenging the execution of Ombudsman decisions cannot be subject to declaratory relief since these decisions are final and executory, as clarifi
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 141993)
Case Citation
- G.R. No. 191176
- Date of Decision: October 14, 2015
- Decided by: Second Division, Honorable Justice Brion
Background of the Case
- The case involves a petition for review on certiorari by the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) challenging an earlier decision by the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Malolos, Bulacan.
- The RTC's decision permanently prohibited the DILG from implementing the Ombudsman's decision against Raul Gatuz, the Barangay Captain of Barangay Tabang, Plaridel, Bulacan, and declared the DILG's memorandum on the matter void.
Facts of the Case
- In February 2008, Felicitas L. Domingo filed an administrative complaint against Raul V. Gatuz for Abuse of Authority and Dishonesty, which led to Administrative Case No. OMB-L-A-08-0126-C.
- The Office of the Deputy Ombudsman for Luzon found Gatuz guilty of Dishonesty on November 17, 2008, imposing a three-month suspension without pay.
- The Deputy Ombudsman indorsed this decision to the Secretary of the DILG for immediate implementation on May 20, 2009, with the DILG receiving it on May 29, 2009.
- Gatuz received the Ombudsman’s decision on June 30, 2009, and moved for reconsideration on July 7, 2009, which led to the DILG deferring implementation pending the reconsideration.
- The Ombudsman denied the motion for reconsideration on July 10, 2009, and clarified on September 22, 2009, that a motion for reconsideration does not stay the implementation of its decisions unless a temporary restraining order (TRO) or w