Title
Department of Justice vs. Mislang
Case
A.M. No. RTJ-14-2369, RTJ-14-2372
Decision Date
Feb 15, 2022
Judge Mislang repeatedly issued improper injunctions and TROs in a P6.5B fraud case, showing gross legal ignorance; denied clemency, dismissed with forfeited benefits.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 170574)

Background and Administrative Complaints

In 2010, the DOJ initiated investigations against Delfin S. Lee and others for fraud involving the Pag-IBIG Fund, leading to two DOJ cases. Mislang granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) at Lee's request, which barred the DOJ from proceeding with criminal charges. This action led to administrative complaints by both the HDMF and DOJ against Mislang for gross ignorance of the law, which were substantiated by a ruling in July 2016 that found him guilty.

Court's Rulings on Mislang's Actions

The Court assessed Mislang's actions in issuing the TROs and a writ of preliminary injunction, determining that no prejudicial question existed to justify such an intervention in the criminal prosecutions. The Court cited Mislang's persistent disregard for procedural law and indicated that his actions demonstrated bad faith and partiality in favor of Lee.

Previous Disciplinary History

Mislang's prior infractions were noted, including earlier findings of gross ignorance leading to penalties ranging from fines to suspension. Due to his repeated violations and failure to amend his conduct, the Court imposed the severe sanction of dismissal from service, which included forfeiture of retirement benefits and disqualification from future government employment.

Petition for Judicial Clemency

Following his administrative dismissal, Mislang filed a Petition for Judicial Clemency on September 22, 2021, seeking reinstatement with full benefits. He argued for clemency based on his extensive track record in government service, claims of financial hardship, and health issues requiring ongoing medical treatment.

Legal Standards for Judicial Clemency

The Court emphasized that judicial clemency is not guaranteed and is granted at its discretion, requiring several criteria to be met. These standards include demonstrating genuine remorse and reformation, sufficient time elapsed since the penalty, age considerations for potential service, promise of future contributions, and other relevant factors.

Evaluation of Mislang's Clemency Petition

The Court found that while the five-year minimum period since dismissal under prev

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.