Title
Del Rosario vs. Shaikh
Case
G.R. No. 206249
Decision Date
Dec 10, 2019
Dispute over election of Liga-Bagac President; mandamus sought for unpaid salaries; SC ruled Vice-Mayor, not Mayor, must approve payments.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 206249)

Relevant Facts

On December 11, 2007, synchronized elections were conducted to determine the officers of the Liga-Bagac Chapter. During the election meeting attended by Punong Barangays, six walked out, yet the remaining Punong Barangays elected Shaikh as the President. Subsequently, Labog, another Punong Barangay, and Ragindin claimed that the elections failed, leading to confusion about the position. Over a series of correspondence, the local government officials required confirmation of the legitimate representative from the Liga to the Sangguniang Bayan, with Shaikh eventually seeking payment for her claimed salaries and allowances following her assumption of the role as ex-officio member.

RTC Ruling

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Balanga City dismissed Shaikh's Petition for mandamus on November 4, 2009. The RTC ruled that since the elections for the Liga-Bagac Chapter were deemed to have failed, Shaikh was never validly elected, and thus lacked any right to claim a title or position. The RTC concluded that Shaikh did not have the standing required to enforce a mandamus.

CA Ruling

In a subsequent appeal, the Court of Appeals (CA) ruled on September 7, 2012, to reverse the RTC's decision. The CA asserted that Shaikh served as a de facto officer and was entitled to the associated salaries and emoluments, emphasizing that a duty existed to compensate her despite the contested legitimacy of her election. The CA concluded that the refusal to release her payments constituted an unlawful neglect of duty by the municipal officials.

Legal Issue

The primary issue presented to the Supreme Court was whether the CA erred in ruling that Mayor Del Rosario, Vice-Mayor Teopengco, and Budget Officer Bontuyan could be compelled through mandamus to release the salaries and emoluments claimed by Shaikh.

Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court found merit in the petition filed by Mayor Del Rosario. The Court defined mandamus as a writ compelling an official to perform a duty mandated by law that has been unlawfully neglected. The decision emphasized that a clear legal duty must be present for mandamus to be applicable, which was not the case pertaining to Mayor Del Rosario since no such obligation to release Shaikh's salaries was outlined in the governing local laws. It further clarified that the administrative control over funds for the Sangguniang Bayan rests with the Vice-Mayor, not the Mayor.

Legal Principles

The ruling highlighted that mandamus may issue only under strict conditions: the petitioner must possess a clear legal right, there must be an established legal duty from the respondent, and that duty must be min

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.