Title
Supreme Court
Del Rosario vs. CW Marketing and Development Corp.
Case
G.R. No. 211105
Decision Date
Feb 20, 2019
Employee dismissed for negligence, loss of trust after falsified documents traced to her computer, upheld by courts.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 211105)

Background of Employment

Del Rosario began her tenure at CW Marketing in 2007 and progressed to the role of Sales Supervisor at the Home Depot, Balintawak Branch. As part of her duties, she was assigned a computer with shared access to a printer/scanner, in which she was the sole employee trained on its operation.

Investigation and Initial Allegations

The situation unraveled in October 2010 when HSBC reported the submission of falsified payslips and identification cards by applicants allegedly associated with CW Marketing. Following an investigation initiated by CW Marketing's IT Department, Del Rosario received a Notice to Explain through which she was asked to clarify her involvement in the alleged falsifications linked to her computer.

Del Rosario's Responses

In her responses to the notices, particularly on November 5 and November 10, 2010, Del Rosario admitted to allowing her subordinates access to her computer but denied any direct participation in the falsifications of documents. She emphasized that other individuals had access to the computer and were responsible for the actions in question, asserting her lack of involvement in any misconduct.

Administrative Inquiry and Termination

An administrative inquiry was held on November 18, 2010, where Del Rosario acknowledged her accountability regarding the computer assigned to her. Consequently, CW Marketing terminated her employment on November 30, 2010, citing multiple violations of the company handbook, including negligence and misuse of company property.

Legal Proceedings

Del Rosario filed a complaint for illegal dismissal, among other claims, at the NLRC. Initially, the Labor Arbiter ruled in her favor, asserting that CW Marketing did not establish that Del Rosario directly committed falsification. However, upon appeal, the NLRC reversed this decision, finding sufficient grounds for Del Rosario's dismissal based on loss of trust and confidence, especially given her supervisory role.

Court of Appeals Ruling

Del Rosario subsequently challenged the NLRC's ruling in the Court of Appeals. The appellate court affirmed the NLRC's decision, agreeing that Del Rosario's negligence in supervising the use of her assigned computer justified her dismissal.

Supreme Court Decision

Del Rosario's petition for certiorari reached the Supreme Court, where it was denied, reinforcing the earlier findings from the NLRC and CA. The Court emphasized that loss of trust and confidence can serve as a valid cause for dismissal, particularly for employees in positions of responsibility. The Court supported the conclusion that Del Rosario's actions demonstrated negligence and a failure to appropriately supervise her subordinates, actions that compromised the company's integ

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.