Title
Supreme Court
Del Prado vs. Spouses Caballero
Case
G.R. No. 148225
Decision Date
Mar 3, 2010
Dispute over land sale: 14,457 sqm lot sold as 4,000 sqm; petitioner claimed lump sum, court ruled discrepancy too large, title incontrovertible.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 132601)

Procedural History and Background

The petition arises from a decision of the Court of Appeals (CA) dated September 26, 2000, which reversed a prior ruling from the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Cebu. The RTC originally awarded several parcels of land to the Caballeros, including Lot No. 11909, in a judgment rendered on February 1, 1985. The Caballeros sold this lot to Del Prado on June 11, 1990, based on a tax declaration. The final decree of registration pertaining to the properties was only issued on November 15, 1990.

Sale Agreement Details

The deed of sale for Lot No. 11909 specified that the lot was approximately 4,000 square meters and included language indicating it was sold for a lump sum of ₱40,000. Del Prado later sought registration for the entire lot under Presidential Decree (P.D.) No. 1529, arguing it was a "cuerpo cierto" sale, meaning the vendor was obligated to deliver the entire property within the specified boundaries, regardless of the stated area.

Dispute Over Sale Terms

The Caballeros opposed this petition, asserting that the sale was only for 4,000 square meters and that the understanding was not one of a lump sum. They moved to dismiss the petition, citing prescription and lack of jurisdiction. The RTC held that the sale was indeed for a lump sum and thus the entirety of Lot No. 11909 should be delivered to Del Prado.

Court of Appeals Decision

The CA reversed the RTC decision, asserting jurisdictional questions over the remedy sought by Del Prado under P.D. No. 1529 after initial registration had been accomplished. The CA concluded that the petition for registration did not constitute an appropriate legal remedy, resulting in the dismissal of Del Prado's petition.

Key Legal Issues

Del Prado raised multiple issues in her petition: (1) whether the CA made erroneous factual findings compared to the RTC; (2) whether the sale constituted a lump sum (cuerpo cierto); and (3) whether the RTC had jurisdiction over the registration petition.

Analysis of Contractual Terms

Central to the dispute is the classification of the sale. Del Prado contends the language in the deed indicates a lump sum sale, citing Article 1542 of the Civil Code, which states that for such sales, the vendor must deliver the entirety of what is included within the stated boundaries, regardless of area discrepancies. However, the Court clarified that substantial differences in area, like the discrepancy of 10,475 sq m in this case,

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.