Case Summary (G.R. No. 90314)
Relevant Case and Legal Proceedings
An Information was filed against Canaco for violating Sections 1 and 2 in relation to Section 9 of Presidential Decree No. 651, which requires accurate registration of births and penalizes falsification. The case was heard in the Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC) Branch 43, Quezon City. During the preliminary conference on May 24, 2004, respondent Barbosa objected to the prosecution’s offer of a photocopy of the birth certificate, requesting a certified true copy, which caused postponement. Subsequently, Barbosa sent letters to relevant agencies warning against the distribution of any copy of the certificate without his client’s authorization.
Respondent’s Conduct and Resulting Court Orders
The MeTC issued an order on October 19, 2004, for a subpoena duces tecum to secure the certified true copy of the birth certificate after noting the prosecution’s difficulty in obtaining it due to the respondent's letters. Canaco, through Barbosa, moved for reconsideration, which was denied in July 2005. Meanwhile, the complainant Victor D. De Los Santos II filed an obstruction of justice complaint against Barbosa, which was dismissed for insufficiency of evidence.
Grounds for the Disbarment Petition
On February 22, 2005, the complainant filed a Petition for Disbarment against Atty. Barbosa, alleging gross violations of his oath as a lawyer and the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR). The petition cited that Barbosa's letters were intentionally crafted to unlawfully obstruct and delay the criminal proceedings by impeding access to key evidence—the certified true copy of the birth certificate. It was argued that such acts were neither legally justifiable nor ethically warranted.
Respondent’s Defense
Barbosa contended that the complaint was filed by a disgruntled litigant after a series of dismissed cases where he was the opposing counsel. He also raised forum shopping allegations, maintaining that the respondent’s actions aimed to clarify the identity of the accused's son, noting discrepancies in the initials used in the Information.
Findings of the Investigating Commissioner
The IBP Commissioner found Barbosa administratively liable for violating his oath and the CPR. The Commissioner ruled that Barbosa’s objection to the photocopy and his sending of letters purposely delayed the prosecution. Barbosa was further found to have knowingly misled the MeTC, the Supreme Court, and the IBP Commission by claiming that Victor Canaco De Los Santos and Victor P. De Los Santos were different individuals, although the difference in initials was a typographical error. The Commissioner recommended a one-year suspension from the practice of law.
IBP Board of Governors’ Resolution
The IBP Board of Governors concurred with the Commissioner’s findings but reduced the suspension penalty from one year to six months. Upon motion for reconsideration by Barbosa, the Board further reduced the suspension to three months but denied the motion to overturn the findings of misconduct.
Supreme Court’s Review and Ruling
Applying the 1987 Philippine Constitution and the Code of Professional Responsibility, the Court affirmed the violations but increased the penalty to a one-year suspension. The Court emphasized the following key points:
- Under Canon 1 and Rules 1.01 and 1.03 of the CPR, lawyers must uphold the law and avoid unlawful or deceitful conduct, including delaying justice.
- Under Canon 12, Rule 12.04, a lawyer must not unduly delay proceedings or misuse court processes. Barbosa's letters obstructed the prosecution’s effort to obtain a lawful, court-ordered document, thereby willfully delaying justice.
- Under Canon 10, Rule 10.01, lawyers must maintain candor and good faith toward the court and must not mislead it. Barbosa deliberately misled authorities regarding the identity of his client’s son by exploiting a typographical error.
- The Court underscored that a lawyer’s primary duty is to the administration of justice, not merely to the client.
The Court found Barbosa’s actions constituted gross violations of his oath and the CPR, markedly beyond previous cases involving false statements due to the deliberate nature and obstruction of judicial processes involved. Given
...continue reading
Case Syllabus (G.R. No. 90314)
Background and Factual Antecedents
- A criminal complaint for Falsification of Public Document was filed by Melba D. De Los Santos Rodis against her father Ricardo D. De Los Santos, Sr. and Rosie P. Canaco.
- The allegation centered on Canaco’s certificate of live birth for her son, Victor Canaco De Los Santos, where she falsely stated she was married to De Los Santos, Sr. on September 1, 1974, a marriage which did not exist.
- On April 24, 2002, criminal charges under Presidential Decree No. 651 were filed against Canaco for knowingly making false statements on the birth certificate of her son.
- The case was docketed as Criminal Case No. 111152 before the Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC), Branch 43, Quezon City.
- At the May 24, 2004 preliminary conference, Atty. Nestor C. Barbosa, representing Canaco, objected to the prosecution’s offer of a photocopy of the birth certificate as evidence, leading to postponement of the conference to October 19, 2004 for the submission of a certified true copy.
- On May 24, 2004, Barbosa sent letters to the Office of the Civil Registrar of Quezon City, National Census and Statistics Office, and St. Luke’s Hospital, warning against the unauthorized distribution of any birth certificate of Victor Canaco De Los Santos without his client’s written authority, citing confidentiality laws.
- The prosecution failed to obtain the certified true copy due to these letters, prompting the MeTC on October 19, 2004, to issue an order for subpoena duces tecum/ad testificandum to compel production of the birth certificate.
- Canaco, through Barbosa, filed a motion for reconsideration of the subpoena issuance, which was denied on July 8, 2005.
- Respondent was subsequently charged with obstruction of justice by Victor D. De Los Santos II, a sibling of the complainant, but the prosecutor dismissed for insufficiency of evidence.
Legal Proceedings Against Respondent Atty. Barbosa
- On February 22, 2005, Victor D. De Los Santos II filed a Petition for Disbarment against Atty. Barbosa for multiple gross violations of his oath and the Code of Professional Responsibility, accusing him of unlawfully delaying and obstructing criminal proceedings against Canaco.
- The complainant argued Barbosa’s May 24, 2004 letters were maliciously intended to suppress the birth record and impede the prosecution.
- Barbosa answered, alleging the complainant was a disgruntled litigant and accused the petition of forum shopping, citing multiple related cases.
- The case was referred to the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) for investigati