Title
De Lima vs. Reyes
Case
G.R. No. 209330
Decision Date
Jan 11, 2016
Murder of Dr. Gerardo Ortega; reinvestigation ordered by DOJ; Court of Appeals nullified DOJ order; Supreme Court ruled petition moot after trial court acquired jurisdiction.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 209330)

Petitioner and Respondent

Petitioners: Secretary of Justice Leila De Lima and members of the Second Panel of prosecutors.
Respondent: Mario Joel T. Reyes.

Key Dates

• January 24, 2011 – Ortega is shot dead; Marlon Recamata arrested and confesses.
• February 6, 2011 – Sinumpaang Salaysay implicates former Governor Reyes.
• February 7, 2011 – Department Order No. 091 creates First Panel of prosecutors.
• June 8 & September 2, 2011 – First Panel dismisses complaint and denies motions to reopen or reconsider.
• September 7, 2011 – Department Order No. 710 creates Second Panel for reinvestigation.
• March 12, 2012 – Second Panel finds probable cause; information filed.
• March 27, 2012 – Trial court issues warrant of arrest.
• March 19 & September 27, 2013 – Court of Appeals declares Department Order No. 710 void.
• January 11, 2016 – Supreme Court issues decision.

Applicable Law and Constitutional Basis

• 1987 Philippine Constitution, Article VIII, Section 1 (judicial review for grave abuse of discretion).
• Republic Act No. 10071 (Prosecution Service Act of 2010), Section 4 (powers of the Secretary of Justice).
• 2000 National Prosecution Service Rule on Appeal (petitions for review, reinvestigation).
• Rules of Court, Rule 112 (preliminary investigation), Rule 65 (certiorari and prohibition).

Preliminary Investigation and First Panel Resolution

Upon Recamata’s confession and additional Sinumpaang Salaysay implicating Reyes, the DOJ’s First Panel conducted a preliminary investigation. On June 8, 2011, it dismissed the complaint for lack of probable cause. Subsequent motions by the complainant (Dr. Ortega’s widow) to reopen the investigation and for partial reconsideration were denied on September 2, 2011, on procedural and substantive grounds.

Creation of Second Panel via Department Order No. 710

Citing the interest of service and due process and fearing a probable miscarriage of justice, Secretary De Lima issued Department Order No. 710 on September 7, 2011. This motu proprio order revoked the earlier panel’s mandate and established a new panel to reinvestigate Ortega’s murder, specifically to address additional evidence previously excluded.

Court of Appeals Proceedings and Ruling

Respondent petitioned the Court of Appeals for certiorari and prohibition, arguing that the Secretary gravely abused her discretion by creating a second panel without compelling circumstances and that both parties had adequate opportunity before the First Panel. On March 19, 2013, the Court of Appeals held Department Order No. 710 null and void for failure to follow the appeal procedure in the 2000 NPS Rule on Appeal and for creating two simultaneous petitions pending before the Secretary. A later motion for reconsideration was denied on September 27, 2013.

Issues Presented

  1. Whether the Secretary of Justice committed grave abuse of discretion in issuing Department Order No. 710.
  2. Whether that issuance is subject to certiorari or prohibition given its executive nature.
  3. Whether the Secretary may motu proprio create a new panel for reinvestigation.
  4. Whether the petition for certiorari became moot upon filing of the information.

Nature of Prosecutorial Functions and Judicial Review

The Court reaffirmed that preliminary investigation is an executive, inquisitorial function focused on determining probable cause, not a trial on merits. Prosecutors do not exercise quasi-judicial functions akin to a court, and their acts are discretionary rather than ministerial. Nonetheless, under the 1987 Constitution (Art. VIII, Sec. 1), judicial review via certiorari is available when a Secretary’s exercise of executive power is tainted by grave abuse of discretion. Such abuse must be “patent and gross” and amount to lack or excess of jurisdiction.

Authority of the Secretary of Justice to Constitute a New Panel

Under RA 10071 Section 4 and Rule 112 Section 4 of the Rules of Court, the Secretary has broad authority to review, reverse, modify, or affirm prosecutorial decisions and to a

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.