Title
Supreme Court
De Leon vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 212623
Decision Date
Jan 11, 2016
Enrique De Leon convicted of Slight Oral Defamation for public slander against SPO3 Leonardo, reduced from Grave due to emotional context and prior provocation.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 212623)

Key Dates

February 27, 2006 – Alleged gun-pointing incident involving SPO3 Leonardo.
April 17, 2006 – First hearing before People’s Law Enforcement Board (PLEB) and alleged defamation.
April 15, 2011 – Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC) Decision convicting De Leon of grave oral defamation.
September 28, 2012 – Regional Trial Court (RTC) Decision affirming MeTC.
May 20, 2014 – Court of Appeals (CA) Resolution affirming RTC with penalty modification.
January 11, 2016 – Supreme Court Decision partially granting petition.

Applicable Law

1987 Philippine Constitution, Article VIII, Section 14 (clear and distinct statement of facts and law).
Rule 36, Section 1 of the Rules of Court (requirements for written decisions).
Revised Penal Code, Article 358 (slight oral defamation) and applicable provisions on grave oral defamation.

Procedural History

MeTC (Branch 6, Manila) convicted De Leon of grave oral defamation. De Leon appealed to the RTC, which affirmed. The CA denied further relief except for penalty adjustment. De Leon filed a petition for review on certiorari with the Supreme Court.

Facts as Found by the Prosecution

De Leon and his son had filed administrative charges against SPO3 Leonardo. On April 17, 2006, while waiting for the PLEB hearing, De Leon allegedly approached Leonardo and publicly uttered: “Walanghiya kang mangongotong na pulis ka, ang yabang yabang mo noon. Patay ka sa akin mamaya.” Leonardo immediately filed criminal charges.

Facts as Offered by the Defense

Defense witnesses recounted an earlier February 27, 2006 incident in which SPO3 Leonardo reportedly pointed a gun at De Leon. De Leon’s counter-charges were said to have been prompted only after receiving a subpoena. Defense denied any deliberate intent to defame and portrayed the April 17 utterance as an emotional outburst.

MeTC Decision

The MeTC found the prosecution credible, treating the police blotter as prima facie evidence. It credited SPO3 Leonardo’s prompt reporting and Principe’s testimony, dismissed defense evidence as self-serving, and convicted De Leon of grave oral defamation, imposing arresto mayor to prision correccional and P10,000 moral damages.

RTC and CA Rulings

The RTC affirmed the MeTC decision, emphasizing deference to trial-court credibility determinations. The CA likewise upheld the conviction but modified the minimum imprisonment to four months (minus one day) to one year, one month and eleven days, denying other relief.

Issues on Certiorari

  1. Whether the MeTC decision failed to clearly and distinctly state the facts and law as required by the Constitution and Rules of Court.
  2. Whether petitioner’s guilt was proven beyond reasonable doubt.

Supreme Court’s Analysis on Decision Clarity

Under the 1987 Constitution and Rule 36, decisions must disclose factual and legal bases. The Supreme Court found the MeTC decision adequately recited both parties’ versions, discussed witness credibility, and explained legal conclusions—satisfying due-process requirements.

Credibility of Witnesses and Bias Allegations

The Court refused to disturb findings on witness credibility, noting no ill motive for Principe and satisfactory demeanor observations by the trial judge. Allegations of Judge Soriaso’s bias were unsupported; absent clear evidence of prejudice, judicial decisions enjoy a presumption of regularity.

Legal Classification of Oral Defamation

Oral defamation consists of publicly uttered words imputing a crime, vice, or defect, maliciously causing dishonor. It is

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.