Title
Supreme Court
De Jesus vs. Inter-Orient Maritime Enterprises, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 203478
Decision Date
Jun 23, 2021
A seafarer with 20 years of service suffered a heart attack, signed a quitclaim, and sought disability benefits. The Supreme Court upheld the quitclaim's validity and ruled his illness was not work-related, barring his claim.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 203478)

Facts of the Case

On July 4, 2005, De Jesus signed a nine-month employment contract with Inter-Orient. During the seventh month at sea, he suffered severe chest pains and was diagnosed with Acute Extensive Myocardial Infarction after hospitalization in Egypt. Upon returning to the Philippines, he signed a Quitclaim to receive unpaid salaries, without fully grasping its implications due to his medical condition. Following medical consultation in the Philippines, he sought treatment and later filed a complaint for disability benefits with the NLRC, which faced dismissal based on res judicata due to the previously executed Quitclaim.

Labor Arbiter's Ruling

The Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of De Jesus, invalidating the Quitclaim on grounds of unconscionable consideration and lack of legal counsel. The Arbiter found that the complaint's dismissal had procedural irregularities and that De Jesus's cardiovascular condition was compensable under the POEA-SEC.

National Labor Relations Commission Ruling

The NLRC overturned the Arbiter's decision, asserting that De Jesus failed to present sufficient evidence to prove that his illness was work-related. It emphasized the necessity for the petitioner to establish a direct relation between his employment and medical condition according to the POEA-SEC's stipulations.

Court of Appeals Ruling

The Court of Appeals dismissed De Jesus's petition for certiorari primarily on procedural grounds, citing numerous technical deficiencies in his filing, including failure to provide supporting documentation and proper verification. De Jesus's subsequent motion for reconsideration was also denied, leading to this appeal.

Supreme Court's Ruling

Upon review, the Supreme Court found that the appellate court's dismissal based solely on procedural defects was improper. The Court noted substantial compliance by De Jesus with procedural requirements and emphasized the importance of addressing the merit of his claims.

Compensability of Disability

The Supreme Court reiterated the principles regarding compensability as outlined in the POEA-SEC, stating that illnesses must be work-related to qualify for benefits. It found that De Jesus did not sufficiently challenge the medical findings that deemed his condition non-work-related, and thus he forfeited his right to claim disability benefits.

Validity of Quitclaims

The Court ruled that the Quitclaim executed by De Jesus was val

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.