Case Summary (G.R. No. 189774)
Background and Legal Transaction History
The case revolves around multiple transactions involving the property in question. On August 8, 1973, Primitiva executed a mortgage document in favor of respondents Spouses Morte for a loan of P20,000. A year later, on February 15, 1974, she sold the property to Spouses Villarico for P33,000. Following this, on February 14, 1977, the Spouses Villarico sold the property back to Primitiva for the same amount. On March 26, 1977, Primitiva sold it again to the Spouses Villarico for P180,000, who later invoked a mortgage with Spouses Morte for another loan on March 28, 1977.
Court Proceedings and Claims
The conflict erupted when Primitiva failed to repay the substantial loan of P500,000 secured by a mortgage executed on November 10, 1979. Consequently, the Spouses Morte initiated an extrajudicial foreclosure action. In response, on February 17, 1986, De Guia filed an Amended Complaint in the Regional Trial Court seeking to annul the mortgage and a lease agreement, alleging that they were executed under duress and lacked valuable consideration.
Findings of the Regional Trial Court
The Regional Trial Court ruled against the petitioners, affirming the validity of the mortgage and the lease agreement. It stated that the documents were executed with full understanding and that any threats made by the respondents, related to the foreclosure application, did not negate consent as they were legally justified. The petitioners attempted to claim coercion but failed to demonstrate this adequately, as a threat of foreclosure was a legal claim.
Court of Appeals and Final Decision
Upon appeal, the Court of Appeals upheld the RTC's ruling, concluding that the transactions dated November 10, 1979, were not void or simulated. The appellate court noted that due to the acknowledgment of existing debts, the waiver of prior transactions, and the financial exchange involved in the execution of the questioned documents, the agreements held merit.
Legal Implications and Arguments
The issues raised by the petitioners included the validity of the transactions, the supposed absence of registration affecting their enforceability, and whether the Court of Appeals erred in validating the contested documents. However, the S
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 189774)
Case Background
- This case concerns a petition for review on certiorari regarding the decision of the Court of Appeals (CA) dated August 30, 2002, and a resolution dated November 28, 2003.
- Petitioners are the heirs of the late Primitiva Lejano Davis, specifically Fe Davis Maramba, Renato Davis, Flordeliza D. Yeh, Jocelyn D. Queblatin, and Betty Davis, who claim ownership of a fishpond property in Meycauayan, Bulacan, covered by TCT No. T-6358.
- The primary petitioner, Manuel T. de Guia, acted as attorney-in-fact for the other petitioners, asserting that he acquired ownership of the subject property from them.
Transactions Involving the Subject Property
- On August 8, 1973, Primitiva executed a mortgage (Kasulatan ng Sanglaan) to spouses Teofilo R. Morte and Angelina C. Villarico for a loan of P20,000.00.
- On February 15, 1974, Primitiva sold the property to spouses Ruperto and Milagros Villarico for P33,000.00.
- On February 14, 1977, the Villaricos sold the property back to Primitiva for the same amount.
- On March 26, 1977, Primitiva resold the property to the Villaricos for P180,000.00.
- On March 28, 1977, Primitiva mortgaged the property again to the Mortes for a loan of P180,000.00.
- On November 10, 1979, several important documents were executed, including:
- A new mortgage (Kasulatan ng Sanglaan) for P500,000.00 t