Title
De Crisologo vs. Singson
Case
G.R. No. L-13876
Decision Date
Feb 28, 1962
Consolacion Florentino and Manuel Singson disputed ownership of a Vigan property under Dona Leona Singson’s will. The Supreme Court ruled the will established a simple substitution, granting Consolacion full ownership of half the property, affirming partition.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-13876)

Procedural History

Spouses Florentino-Crisologo sued Dr. Singson for partition, alleging each owned an undivided one-half of the property—Consolacion by virtue of Dona Leona’s will and Singson by inheritance. The Court of First Instance declared them co-owners (½ each) and ordered partition; on appeal, that judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 3605-R). The present appeal (G.R. No. L-13876) followed.

Testamentary Provision (Clause IX)

In her 1951 will, Dona Leona bequeathed to her grandniece Consolacion Florentino “half of my house of strong materials with galvanized iron roof, including half of its lot” at Vigan. She further provided that, if Consolacion died before or after the testatrix, “this property shall be given in equal parts” to her three brothers—Evaristo, Manuel, Dionisio—or to their forced heirs.

Applicable Law

Civil Code of 1889 (in force at testatrix’s death). Key provisions:

  • Art. 774: Permits simple (vulgar) substitution to replace an heir who predeceases, declines or cannot accept the inheritance.
  • Art. 781: Validates fideicommissary substitution (heir charged to preserve and transmit inheritance) up to second degree or in favor of persons living at testator’s death.
  • Art. 785: Requires fideicommissary substitution to be expressly named or to impose an absolute obligation on the fiduciary to deliver the property to a second heir.

Distinction Between Substitutions

A fideicommissary substitution demands an explicit mandate on the first heir to conserve and transmit the inheritance to a second heir; simple substitution operates by naming a substitute without such obligation. Jurisprudence and doctrine (Manresa) emphasize that absence of an express obligation or terminology of fideicommissary substitution yields a vulgar substitution.

Analysis and Holding

Clause IX does not expres

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.