Title
Supreme Court
Darroca, Jr. vs. Century Maritime Agencies, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 234392
Decision Date
Nov 10, 2021
Seafarer Darroca claimed work-related depression; courts ruled illness not compensable due to lack of proof, non-compliance with treatment, and reporting requirements, but awarded P50,000 as financial assistance.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 234392)

Applicable Law

This case is governed by the 1987 Philippine Constitution and applicable labor laws, specifically the provisions outlined in the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration Standard Employment Contract (POEA-SEC), which governs the rights and obligations of seafarers in relation to employment-related illnesses and injuries.

Background of the Case

Darroca began his employment with Century Maritime on May 10, 1998, and was rehired on August 12, 2012. Shortly after boarding the MT "Dynasty," he reported experiencing severe mental health issues, including sleep difficulties, extreme exhaustion, and hallucinations. After consulting a doctor in Houston, USA, he was diagnosed with major depression and was declared unfit for sea duty. Following his repatriation to the Philippines, a company-designated physician assessed his condition and determined that it was not work-related, leading to subsequent disputes over his claims for disability benefits.

Labor Arbiter’s Ruling

On February 10, 2015, the Labor Arbiter denied Darroca’s claim for total and permanent disability benefits, citing a lack of causal connection between his illness and employment. Despite acknowledging Darroca's service, the Arbiter emphasized that Darroca failed to show that his mental health issues were caused or aggravated by his work conditions. As a form of equitable relief, the Arbiter awarded a financial assistance of Php 50,000, despite denying the major claims.

National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) Ruling

Darroca appealed to the NLRC, arguing that his illness was work-related. However, the NLRC upheld the Labor Arbiter's decision, maintaining that Darroca did not demonstrate a direct connection between his condition and his employment duties. It referenced the lack of specific evidence regarding his job responsibilities and reiterated that the burden of proof rested on him. The lack of proven causation between his diagnosed mental conditions and his seafaring duties led to a dismissal of his claims for disability benefits and other compensatory damages.

Court of Appeals’ Decision

Darroca's petition for certiorari was denied by the Court of Appeals on March 24, 2017. The Court affirmed the findings of the NLRC, emphasizing again that without substantial evidence establishing a work-related cause for Darroca’s condition, the claims for total and permanent disability benefits were unfounded. The appellate court highlighted that mental illnesses required a specific relationship to traumatic injury under relevant labor standards, which was not established in this case.

Legal Principles: Work-Relatedness and Compensability

Compensability for disabilities under the POEA-SEC necessitates two conditions: the injury or illness must be work-related, and the work-related injury must exist within the term of employment. The presumption of work

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.