Title
Dagdag, Jr. vs. Public Service Commission
Case
G.R. No. L-11940
Decision Date
Jul 25, 1958
A widow sued bus owners for damages after her husband died in an accident. The court ruled in her favor, leading to multiple execution sales of the bus franchise, contested by third parties. The Public Service Commission provisionally approved the sale to ensure public service continuity, upheld by the Supreme Court despite pending validity disputes.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-11940)

Factual Background

On May 9, 1953, Corazon de Castro filed a complaint against several defendants after her husband, Jose Castro, died in a bus accident. The Court of First Instance of Ilocos Norte found the defendants liable, ordering them to pay damages. The defendants, excluding Alfredo Formoso, sold their interests in the certificate of public convenience to Virginia Sambrano. Following a series of legal actions and claims, including a challenge from Dagdag regarding ownership, the certificate was sold at public auction to the Estate of Florencio P. Buan.

Legal Proceedings

The Public Service Commission initially dismissed the application for the transfer of the certificate but later provisionally approved it pending litigation concerning the legality of the sheriff's sale. The approval included authorization for the Estate of Buan to operate the service, subject to modification or revocation.

Petitioners' Arguments

The petitioners argued that the Commission acted outside its authority by approving the sale while the validity of the sheriff's sale was under judicial review. They claimed that the Commission's actions could render their legal challenges moot and necessary. Additionally, they contended that the provisional approval lacked factual justification and ignored the priority of their application.

Commission's Authority and Provisional Approval

The Court upheld the Commission's authority to provisionally approve sales under Section 20(g) of the Public Service Act. The Court noted that such approval is designed to protect public interest, and did not erode the petitioners' right to contest the sale's validity in court. The Court referenced precedent emphasizing that provisional approvals allow continued service while legal rights are adjudicated.

Findings Justifying Approval

The Court found that the Commission had made sufficient factual findings to justify its decision. The approval recognized that the sale completed the legal execution of a debt judgment and that the purchaser was qualified to operate the transportation service.

Arguments Regarding Prior Application

The petitioners maintained that their application should have been prioritized but did not sufficiently express this concern during the proceedings at the Commission level. The Court ruled that the priority of applications is subordinate to the stability and public benefit of the proposed sales, concluding that the Estate of Buan's credentials presented a superior option.

Irreparable Injury and Legality of Operations

The Court rejected the petitioners' claim of irreparable harm due to their ongoing operations, deeming them unlawful as the sale had not been approved. This illegality negated their claims for damages resulting from the Co

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.