Title
Curammeng y Pablo vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 219510
Decision Date
Nov 14, 2016
Bus collision case: Driver Curammeng convicted of reckless imprudence resulting in homicide; Supreme Court reversed CA's dismissal, remanding for merits review, emphasizing procedural flexibility for justice.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-4067)

Applicable Law

The case involves the interpretation and application of procedural rules under Rule 42 of the Rules of Court, particularly concerning the requirement for certifications of non-forum shopping and the presentation of material portions of the record during appeals.

Background of the Case

The case originated from an Information filed against Curammeng, charging him with Reckless Imprudence Resulting in Homicide, pursuant to Article 365 of the Revised Penal Code. It was alleged that Curammeng, while driving an RCJ bus, negligently collided with Francisco Franco, the driver of a stalled Maria De Leon bus that had suffered a tire blowout, leading to Franco's death.

MTC Findings

The MTC convicted Curammeng on November 26, 2013, citing his inexcusable lack of precaution while driving near the stalled bus. The court emphasized that Curammeng had failed to adequately decelerate and was running at approximately 60 kilometers per hour when the accident occurred. The MTC sentenced him to imprisonment ranging from four months and one day to four years and two months, imposed civil indemnity and actual damages to Franco's heirs.

RTC Affirmation

Curammeng's conviction was upheld by the RTC in a ruling dated June 3, 2014, which reiterated his duty as a professional driver to ensure the safety of himself, his passengers, and other road users. The RTC found that the lighting conditions and obstructed road visibility compounded his negligence leading to Franco’s death.

Appeals Dismissed by the CA

Curammeng's subsequent appeal to the CA was dismissed outright in a resolution on October 20, 2014, due to his failure to comply with procedural requirements, notably not attaching a certification of non-forum shopping and certain material records. His attempts to rectify this oversight were unsuccessful, as the CA denied reinstatement of his petition based on perceived lack of compelling reasons.

Supreme Court Review

The Supreme Court found the petition meritorious, holding that procedural compliance is essential but recognizing that it should not result in a miscarriage of justice. The court ruled that dismissing Cu

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.