Title
Commonwealth of the Philippines vs. Baldello
Case
G.R. No. 45375
Decision Date
Apr 12, 1939
Gloria Baldello retained Philippine citizenship despite marrying a stateless man; her petition for naturalization was unnecessary as she never lost her original citizenship.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 4414)

Background Facts

Gloria Baldello married Gabino Ordorica on November 12, 1921. Gabino was a member of the United States Army stationed in the Philippines during this period. The marriage lasted until August 24, 1924, when Gloria was abandoned by Gabino. In response to Gabino's long absence and his unknown whereabouts for over eleven years, Gloria sought a legal declaration of his presumptive death, which was granted on December 31, 1935.

Legal Proceedings

Subsequently, on June 29, 1936, Gloria filed a petition to restore her Filipino citizenship, which was denied by the lower court. This prompted her to appeal the decision, arguing her case based on her marital status and the implications it had on her citizenship rights.

Applicable Law

The ruling considered the citizenship laws as they pertain to marriage, particularly referencing the Constitution of Mexico and U.S. naturalization laws. According to Mexican law, Gabino lost his Mexican citizenship due to his service in the U.S. Army. Concurrently, he did not fulfill the criteria required to be naturalized as an American citizen according to U.S. legal standards. Therefore, at the time of his marriage to Gloria, Gabino was effectively rendered stateless.

Key Legal Question

The primary legal question presented was whether Gloria Baldello's marriage to a stateless individual affected her own citizenship status. The court examined whether the general principle that a married woman adopts her husband's nationality applies when the husband has no recognized nationality.

Court's Analysis

The court concluded that since Gabino Ordorica was not a citizen of any nation, he could not impose a new citizenship status upon Gloria through their marriage. Established legal principles suggest that the presumption operates only when there exists a valid nationality on the husband’s part that could be adopted by the wife. The court held that since there was no nationality for Gabino, Gloria's original Philippine citizenship remained intact and was not diminished by her marriage.

Precedential Support

The ruling further referenced the decision in Roa vs. Collector of Customs, which aligns with the legal provision in Commonwealth Act No. 63. This provision asserts that a Filipino woman do

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.