Title
Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Island Garment Manufacturing Corp.
Case
G.R. No. L-46644
Decision Date
Sep 11, 1987
A garment manufacturer contested tax assessments for alleged local sales of imported textiles; the Supreme Court ruled in its favor, citing lack of evidence and timely appeal.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 210528)

Applicable Law

The primary laws applicable in this case include Republic Act No. 3137, which governs the importation and supervision of textile materials, and the provisions of Republic Act No. 1125, which created the Court of Tax Appeals and outlines the procedure for appeal from tax assessments.

Procedural Background

On October 21, 1964, and February 24, 1965, investigations into the respondent corporation’s tax liabilities were initiated, resulting in assessments totaling P627,189.94, comprising deficiency income tax and advance sales tax. The corporation protested these assessments but had its requests denied, leading to the filing of a petition for review with the Court of Tax Appeals on February 26, 1970.

Issues for Resolution

The primary issues to resolve are: (1) whether the respondent corporation filed its appeal within the thirty-day period prescribed under Section 11 of Republic Act No. 1125; and (2) whether it is liable for the assessed tax amounts based on claims of improper re-exportation of finished goods.

Appeal Timeliness

According to Section 11 of Republic Act No. 1125, a person adversely affected by a decision of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue can appeal within thirty days of receiving the decision. The respondent corporation received the adverse decision denying their protest on September 23, 1969. The court found that the corporation's letter dated the same day constituted a valid request for reconsideration, which raised new issues and effectively interrupted the thirty-day period for filing an appeal.

Examination of Tax Assessments

The petitioner argued that discrepancies arose from an overdeclaration of re-exported goods, asserting that the quantities claimed were impossible given the available shipping conditions. However, the Court of Tax Appeals found that the assessments were based on mere presumptions rather than on solid factual evidence. It emphasized that tax assessments must rely on actual facts rather than conjecture or

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an analytical tool focused on understanding Philippine cases deeply, not a general AI assistant.