Case Summary (G.R. No. 145559)
Applicable Law
The relevant legal framework is found in the 1987 Philippine Constitution and provisions of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC), particularly those dealing with value-added tax (VAT).
Background and Facts
Respondent Benguet Corporation was registered for VAT and sought zero-rating for its sales of mine products. VAT Ruling No. 378-88 and subsequent rulings from the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) affirmed the zero-rate status for sales of gold to the Central Bank, treating them as export sales. The respondent sold gold during the taxable periods specified and incurred input VAT on these sales.
However, a subsequent VAT Ruling (No. 008-92) issued on January 23, 1992, reclassified these sales as domestic transactions subject to a 10% VAT. Respondent's application for tax credit based on the zero-rating principle was subsequently denied, which prompted it to seek recourse in the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA).
Court of Tax Appeals Proceedings
The CTA initially dismissed Benguet Corporation's consolidated petitions for tax credits, concluding that the retroactive application of the VAT ruling did not unduly prejudice the corporation. The decision was later contested by the respondent, leading to an appeal to the Court of Appeals (CA).
Court of Appeals Decision
The CA first affirmed the CTA's decision but later reversed its position upon a reconsideration motion filed by the respondent, granting a tax credit amounting to P131,741,034.22, with a specific emphasis on $49,749,223.31 related to sales made to the Central Bank. The CA determined that the retroactive application of VAT Ruling No. 008-92 would cause substantial prejudice to the respondent due to reliance on prior rulings.
Petitioner’s Arguments
The petitioner contended that the CA erred by rejecting the retroactive application of VAT Ruling No. 008-92 and argued that the retroactive adjustment would not prejudice the respondent since alternative remedies were available for recovering the input VAT.
Key Legal Principles Discussed
The Court underscored the principle that tax rulings and regulations should not be applied retroactively if it prejudices taxpayers. Section 246 of the NIRC asserts that no alterations to tax rulings shall have retroactive effect if they negatively affect the taxpayer, except under specific circumstances such as misstatements in tax returns or bad faith.
Assessment of Prejudice
The Court determined that retroactively applying the new VAT ruling would indeed prejudice the respondent. The inability to pass on the 10% VAT to the Central Bank, combined with the denial of
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 145559)
Case Overview
- The case involves a petition for review filed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (petitioner) against Benguet Corporation (respondent), seeking to reverse the resolutions issued by the Court of Appeals (CA) related to tax credits.
- The specific amounts contested include a tax credit of P49,749,223.31 attributed to input VAT from gold sales to the Central Bank, covering the period from January 1, 1988, to July 31, 1989.
Background of the Parties
- Benguet Corporation: A domestic corporation engaged in mining, specifically in the exploration, development, and operation of mining properties. It is a VAT-registered enterprise since January 1, 1988.
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue: The government official responsible for assessing and collecting taxes, including value-added tax (VAT).
Key Facts of the Case
- Benguet Corporation applied for a zero-rating on its sales of mine products in January 1988, which was approved by the Commissioner.
- On August 28, 1988, the Deputy Commissioner issued VAT Ruling No. 378-88, declaring sales of gold to the Central Bank as export sales subject to 0% VAT.
- Respondent sold gold to the Central Bank under this ruling and incurred input taxes during the taxable periods in question.
- Various BIR rulings from 1988 to 1990 confirmed that these sales were