Title
Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Estate of Mr. Charles Marvin Romig
Case
G.R. No. 262092
Decision Date
Oct 9, 2024
The CIR challenged the CTA's ruling granting refund of erroneously paid estate tax on foreign currency deposits, invoking tax exemption laws. Court affirmed refund rights based on statutory rules.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 117472)

Facts of the Case

Charles Marvin Romig, an American national, passed away intestate in the Philippines on November 20, 2011. At the time of his death, he resided in Aguada, Poblacion, Puerto Galera, Oriental Mindoro. Following his death, Maricel Narciso Romig executed an Affidavit of Self-Adjudication, claiming the decedent's properties, including a dollar deposit in a foreign currency deposit unit at the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC). An Estate Tax Return was filed, and an estate tax of PHP 26,152.00 was paid on May 18, 2012. Subsequently, on June 30, 2015, the Estate filed an Amended Estate Tax Return and paid an additional PHP 4,565,349.07 concerning the HSBC USD Savings Account.

Administrative Claim for Refund

On June 28, 2017, the Estate filed an administrative claim for a refund concerning the erroneously paid estate tax of PHP 4,565,349.07 with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), followed by a judicial claim before the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) on the same day. The CIR contested the claim by arguing that the Estate was not entitled to the refund and raised several defenses, including issues on the decedent's residency, allowable deductions, and claims regarding the non-exhaustion of administrative remedies.

Ruling of the CTA Second Division

The CTA Second Division ruled in favor of the Estate on September 2, 2019, granting the refund. The court concluded that the administrative and judicial claims were filed within the prescribed two-year period. Additionally, it affirmed that the exemption of foreign currency deposits under Republic Act No. 6426 had not been revoked by the 1997 National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC), thus allowing for the refund claim related to the estate tax paid.

Ruling of the CTA En Banc

The CTA En Banc affirmed the Second Division's decision on October 28, 2021. The En Banc noted that the Estate complied with the two-year period requirement for filing claims, asserting that the required affirmative votes to reverse the previous ruling were not achieved, thereby upholding the lower court's decision. However, it expressed that, regarding the HSBC USD Savings Account, the reliance on Republic Act No. 6426 for tax exemption was misplaced as the law addresses income tax specifically.

Motion for Reconsideration

In a subsequent Resolution dated July 19, 2022, the CTA En Banc reiterated that the Estate satisfied the requirements for a refund of erroneously paid estate tax. It reconfirmed that the provisions of the 1997 NIRC could not infer a repeal of the tax exemptions provided under Republic Act No. 6426.

Issues Presented

The key issues for the Court's resolution included whether the Estate had complied with the two-year period establish

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.