Title
City of Manila vs. Cheng y Chiang
Case
G.R. No. L-3444
Decision Date
Feb 26, 1907
The City of Manila owns a property historically used for public purposes; defendants' claims of ownership based on historical use and financial contributions were dismissed due to insufficient evidence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 239584)

Facts of the Case

The City of Manila asserts ownership of the disputed land, having been the sole owner prior to 1872. Between 1872 and 1873, the city constructed a building on the lot, referred to as the "Tribunal of the gremio of the Chinese," which served public governmental purposes and was maintained by the city until 1898. After the arrival of American forces, the building was occupied by soldiers and later the Chinese consul. Currently, it is occupied by the defendants, representing a voluntary association without any official government ties.

Defendants' Claim

The defendants contend that the tribunal previously existed in Calle Nueva until it was destroyed by fire on March 29, 1870. They argue that the City of Manila exchanged the Calle Nueva property for the land on Calle San Fernando when street widening necessitated the relocation. However, the defendants have not proven ownership of Calle Nueva by the Chinese or the existence of an exchange agreement with the city.

Evaluation of Evidence

The court found that the evidence presented by the defendants was insufficient to support their claims regarding ownership and the supposed land exchange. Furthermore, a historical account indicated that a tax illegally collected from 8,720 Chinese was used to fund the construction of the city building, but this does not confer any ownership rights to the defendants as representatives of a benevolent association. The legal connection between the collected fun

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.