Title
Supreme Court
Chua vs. Cordova
Case
A.M. No. P-19-3960
Decision Date
Sep 7, 2020
Sheriff Cordova suspended for 1 year for grave abuse of authority, violating court personnel code, after unlawfully enforcing a dissolved writ, causing property damage.

Case Summary (A.M. No. P-19-3960)

Facts of the Case

Chua's allegations stemmed from a civil complaint filed by spouses Gerd and Sarah Gerbig against her daughter, Odette R. Chua. The complaint sought enforcement of an easement, alleged violations of the National Building Code, and damages. The RTC issued a Writ of Preliminary Mandatory Injunction on March 4, 2008, ordering the removal of certain structures. Following a motion filed by Odette, the court granted her request to dissolve the injunction but conditioned it upon the posting of a counter-bond amounting to P800,000.00. Despite receiving the order on April 18, 2008, Chua claimed that Sheriff Cordova executed a demolition of their property without proper authority, engaging in abusive behavior during the process.

Allegations Against Respondent

Chua alleged that on April 25, 2008, Sheriff Cordova, accompanied by workers, unlawfully demolished parts of her property without presenting a valid execution order. During the demolition, it is claimed that Sherif Cordova insulted her and acted in a manner unbefitting a public servant. Chua indicated that the demolition resulted in significant damage to several personal properties, asserting that these acts constituted grave misconduct, conduct unbecoming a public servant, and violations of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act.

Respondent's Defense

In his response to the charges, Sheriff Cordova admitted to having both the writ of execution and the writ of injunction issued simultaneously. He argued that it was his duty to execute court orders promptly and claimed that efforts were made to remind Chua of the pending demolition, citing her alleged hostility. Cordova denied disrespecting Chua or her property and asserted that he followed necessary protocols to mitigate damages during the execution of what he believed to be a lawful order.

Administrative Complaint and Investigation

The Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) evaluated the allegations against Sheriff Cordova and recommended re-docketing the complaint as a regular administrative case. The OCA found him guilty of grave abuse of authority, leading to a recommendation for suspension and a fine, specifically citing a deviation from his ministerial duties.

Court’s Ruling

The Supreme Court agreed with the OCA's findings, emphasizing the high standards expected from sheriffs as agents of the law. The Court noted that Cordova had overstepped his authority by acting on an execution order that had been effectively dissolved by the trial court's subsequent order. The Court explicitly stated that compliance with court orders lies within the court's discretion, not the sheriff's.

Determination of Liability

Sheriff Co

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.