Title
China Banking Corp. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 117604
Decision Date
Mar 26, 1997
A stockholder pledged shares to CBC as loan security. VGCCI sold the shares despite CBC's prior claim. SC ruled CBC had prior rights, nullifying VGCCI's sale.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 120905)

Petitioner

China Banking Corporation

Respondents

Court of Appeals
Valley Golf & Country Club, Inc.

Key Dates

• August 21, 1974 – Calapatia pledges Stock Certificate No. 1219 to CBC
• September 16–27, 1974 – CBC requests and VGCCI records the pledge
• August 3, 1983 – Calapatia renews loan (P20,000) secured by the existing pledge
• April 12, 1985 – CBC files for extrajudicial foreclosure; May 17, 1985 auction notice
• September 17, 1985 – Public auction; CBC acquires the pledged share at P20,000
• December 10, 1986 – VGCCI auctions the same share for Calapatia’s delinquent dues
• September 9, 1990 – CBC files complaint with SEC for nullification of VGCCI’s sale
• January 3 & April 14, 1992 – SEC hearing officer dismisses CBC’s petition
• June 4 & December 7, 1993 – SEC en banc reverses and orders issuance of new certificate to CBC
• August 15 & October 5, 1994 – Court of Appeals nullifies SEC orders for lack of jurisdiction; denies reconsideration
• March 26, 1997 – Supreme Court decides on review

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution – governing judicial and quasi-judicial powers
• Presidential Decree No. 902-A, Sections 3 and 5(b) – grants SEC original and exclusive jurisdiction over intra-corporate controversies
• Corporation Code (B.P. Blg. 68), Art. 63 – restricts transfer of shares subject to unpaid subscriptions
• Civil Code, Arts. 2087, 2099 – governs pledge, foreclosure, and pledgee’s diligence

Summary of Facts

Calapatia, a VGCCI member, pledged one share (Cert. No. 1219) to CBC in 1974 to secure existing and future obligations (up to P20,000). After he renewed his indebtedness in 1983, CBC foreclosed extrajudicially and purchased the share in 1985. VGCCI, citing Calapatia’s unpaid club dues, conducted its own auction in December 1986, selling the same share and terminating his membership. CBC sought registration of the share under its name before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Makati (dismissed for intra-corporate nature), then before the SEC (hearing officer dismisses; en banc reverses), and finally appealed to the Court of Appeals (which nullified SEC orders for lack of jurisdiction). CBC elevated the matter to the Supreme Court.

Issue

Which tribunal—regular courts or the SEC—has jurisdiction over the dispute concerning ownership and transfer of a corporate share sold under a club’s by-law for delinquency, and did VGCCI validly defeat CBC’s rights as pledgee?

Jurisdiction under P.D. No. 902-A

P.D. 902-A vests the SEC with original and exclusive jurisdiction over “controversies arising out of intra-corporate relations” (Sec. 5[b]) and over all corporations licensed by government (Sec. 3). Disputes between a corporation and its stockholder concerning share ownership and by-law interpretation fall squarely within SEC competence.

Nature of the Controversy and Share Ownership

CBC acquired ownership by valid foreclosure and public auction (Art. 2087, Civil Code). VGCCI had previously recognized the pledge in its books and never contested the transfer. CBC is therefore a bona fide stockholder, making the conflict an intra-corporate controversy under Sec. 5(b) of P.D. 902-A.

Interpretation of Corporate By-laws

The dispute turns on VGCCI’s by-law authorizing sale of a delinquent member’s share. Interpretation and application of corporate by-laws demand specialized expertise, uniformity, and administrative discretion—factors favoring SEC primary jurisdiction under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction.

Validity of the Pledge Agreement

The 1974 pledge expressly secured future loans up to P20,000; the 1983 promissory note was a rene

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.