Title
Century Insurance Company Inc. vs. Fuentes
Case
G.R. No. L-16039
Decision Date
Aug 31, 1961
Employee claimed work-related tuberculosis; employer contested timeliness. Supreme Court upheld Workmen's Compensation Commission's jurisdiction despite delayed filing, remanding for further proceedings.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-16039)

Background of Employment and Illness Claim

Cesar M. Pablico was employed as an accountant by Century Insurance Company, Inc. from June 1, 1950, until December 6, 1958, receiving a monthly salary of P500. He communicated his illness to his employer on July 1, 1957, and requested a layoff, expressing his intention to return once he recovered. On December 22, 1958, Pablico notified the company in writing of his contraction of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Timeline of Events

The formal claim for compensation was initiated by Pablico on December 23, 1958, one day after notifying Century Insurance. The company acknowledged receipt of the claim on January 2, 1959. The legal representatives of the company contested the claim on various grounds, including a late filing based on the argument that the claim was submitted after the statutory deadline, having been filed 17 days post-termination of employment.

Legal Contentions

Century Insurance Company argued that Pablico's claim was barred by the Statute of Limitations, asserting that he failed to meet the conditions stipulated by law for the presentation of compensation claims. The company sought judicial intervention to prevent the hearing of Pablico’s claim on these grounds.

Court Actions and Decisions

The hearing officer denied the motion to dismiss brought by Century Insurance Co. on May 11, 1959, and subsequently dismissed a motion for reconsideration on May 26, 1959. In response, Century Insurance initiated certiorari proceedings, claiming that Pablico's compensation claim was not submitted within the required time frame per Section 24 of Act No. 3428. This act requires claimants to present their claims within two months after the date of injury or sickness.

Court Ruling

The Court ruled in favor of Century Insurance, confirming that Pablico's claim was not timely filed and therefore dismissed it. The court held that the officers had acted beyond their jurisdiction by entertaining a claim that was not presented within the statutory period. It affirmed that the jurisdiction of the Workmen's Compensation officers hinges on the timely filing of claims, and thus rendered the lawsuit invalid.

Jurisdictional Implications

The ruling established a clear principle that jurisdiction for hearing compensation claims is contingent upon the adherence to statutory timelines for submission. The court differentiated between the general authority to hear claims and the jurisdictional limits imposed by the expiration of the allowed filing period. It clarified that while the right to compensation could be exhausted by lack of timeliness, the determination of jurisdiction was inherently linked to the method and timing of claim presentations.

Review

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.