Title
Celino vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 77569
Decision Date
Jun 29, 1988
Accused defrauded complainant by falsely claiming to recover hidden treasures, inducing him to pay P50,230. Convicted of Estafa, affirmed by courts.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 77569)

Procedural Background

On August 14, 1981, the First Assistant Provincial Fiscal of Laguna filed the information for estafa against the Celino brothers in the Court of First Instance of Laguna. The information detailed allegations of fraud through deceitful pretenses, aiming to mislead the complainant into believing in the existence of hidden treasures, which resulted in the payment of P50,230.00 by the complainant to the accused. Only Ricardo Celino faced trial, as the case against his brother Zosimo was dismissed posthumously. On May 29, 1985, the trial court found Ricardo guilty and sentenced him to imprisonment and restitution.

Factual Overview

The prosecution's case hinged on the testimonies of Jose Tan Kapoe and several witnesses, including Feliciano Batitis and Ricardo dela Cruz. Kapoe's account detailed how he was misled by the accused into believing that treasures buried beneath his property could be retrieved through a process he was obligated to pay for, with payments made over several occasions culminating in the total sum of P50,230.00. The method employed by the accused included deceptive practices, which involved hoaxes such as claiming instructions from a spiritual being purported to direct the digging process.

Defense Presentation

In response, the defense presented the testimonies of Ricardo Celino and Gualberto Libres. Ricardo claimed ignorance of any monetary transactions involving Kapoe and suggested that any payments made were connected to his deceased son Zosimo without his knowledge. Libres confirmed that at no point was Ricardo involved in discussions regarding the alleged treasure. The defense's position sought to portray the situation as a misunderstanding rather than a criminal conspiracy.

Appellate Review

Upon appeal, the Court of Appeals reviewed the trial court's findings and affirmed the conviction, determining that there was sufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The appellate court rejected the argument that the transactions were mere joint ventures, reaffirming that the actions of the Celino brothers amounted to swindling as codified in Article 315 of the Revised Penal Code. The court cited their use of false pretenses to exploit the complainant's trust and gullibility.

Legal Principles Applied

The Court of Appeals upheld that the elements of estafa under Article 315 were met, emphasizing the fraudulent nature of the representations made by Ricardo and Zosimo Celino. These included pretending to possess supernatural abilities to locate hidden treasures, which constituted dec

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.