Case Summary (G.R. No. 83190)
Factual Background
The origins of the Cebu Seamen’s Association date back to October 23, 1950, when a group of maritime officers registered as a non-stock corporation. The association later registered with the Bureau of Labor Relations (BLR) as SAPI on June 23, 1969. A CBA between SAPI and Aboitiz Shipping Corporation was in effect, expiring on December 31, 1988. Tensions arose when a faction led by Gabayoyo claimed to be newly elected officers as of January 20, 1987, leading to a dispute over the collection of union dues and agency fees.
Legal Proceedings
On May 26, 1987, the faction led by Nacua filed a complaint against the Gabayoyo group, asserting their status as the duly elected officers of SAPI and requesting the remittance of collected dues from Aboitiz. The Gabayoyo faction responded by claiming the Nacua group had been expelled from the association, filing a motion to dismiss based on jurisdictional claims over the dispute.
Jurisdictional Issues
The Med-Arbiter upheld jurisdiction over this intra-union dispute under Article 226 of the Labor Code, which grants authority to the Bureau of Labor Relations to resolve such conflicts. The primary issue was determining which set of officers, Gabayoyo’s or Nacua’s, had the right to the collection and custody of union dues.
Findings on Membership and Leadership
Evidence established that while CSAI, the corporate entity, had ceased operations and faced potential revocation of its registration, Nacua retained her status as the President of SAPI, independent of her expulsion from CSAI. Nacua's leadership was validated by her reelection in 1987-1989, illustrating that actions taken by Gabayoyo’s faction did not have valid implications for the labor union.
Legal Status of the Organizations
SAPI is recognized as the legitimate labor organization with rights as provided under the Labor Code, distinguishing it from the dormant CSAI. Gabayoyo's claim to leadership was rooted solely in the inactive corporation’s elections, lacking relevance to the operational union structure.
C
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 83190)
Case Overview
- This case arises from a petition for the reversal of a resolution issued by the Bureau of Labor Relations (BLR) affirming a decision of the Med-Arbiter regarding the rightful officers of the Seamen's Association of the Philippines (SAPI).
- The resolution determined that Dominica C. Nacua and her group were the lawful officers entitled to the union dues and agency fees collected from the Aboitiz Shipping Corporation.
Parties Involved
- Petitioner: Cebu Seamen's Association, Inc. (CSAI), represented by Manuel Gabayoyo, asserting that they were the newly elected officers of the union.
- Respondents: Hon. Pura Ferrer-Calleja and Dominica C. Nacua, who claimed to be the legitimate officers of SAPI based on their election prior to the dispute.
Background Facts
- The Cebu Seamen's Association, Inc. (CSAI) was organized and registered in 1950 as a non-stock corporation.
- In 1969, the same group registered as a labor union, Seamen's Association of the Philippines (SAPI), with the BLR.
- A collective bargaining agreement (CBA) existed between SAPI and Aboitiz Shipping Corporation, which was to expire on December 31, 1988.
- In February 1987, a faction led by Gabayoyo claimed to be the new officers and sought the union dues from Aboitiz Shipping, which had been remitting dues until that point.
Previous Proceedings
- The dispute led to a com