Title
Cea vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. L-1776
Decision Date
Oct 27, 1949
Hacienda Cabasay ownership dispute: Alfredo Natividad's void sale during judicial administration contested; Supreme Court remands for ownership determination.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 119368)

Background Facts

Gregorio Natividad and Benedicta Villanueva willed their joint ownership of Hacienda Cabasay to their grandson, Alfredo Natividad. Following Gregorio’s death, his estate was placed under judicial administration, and public notice of this administration was made. Despite the judicial oversight, Alfredo executed a sale of the hacienda to Gerardo Cea, which triggered legal disputes. A settlement occurred in which Alfred ceded part of the hacienda to Gregorio's heirs, while Gerardo later sold the property to Paz M. Cea, who subsequently sold half to Sebastian Moll.

Legal Proceedings and Decisions

The Court of First Instance initially granted Paz M. Cea and Sebastian Moll applications to register their respective half interests in the hacienda. However, the Court of Appeals modified this decision, allowing registration of the portion that came from Benedicta only, denying the half inherited from Gregorio, citing that Alfredo's sale was void due to the property being under judicial custody. No appeal was filed against this appellate decision.

Subsequent Claims and Res Judicata Issue

In 1941, descendants of Gregorio sought recognition as heirs and requested adjudication of the half interest corresponding to Alfredo. Paz M. Cea and Sebastian Moll opposed these claims, seeking title to the same property. The Court of First Instance supported the heirs, reasoning that the previous ruling by the Court of Appeals rendered Alfredo's sale null and void, thus leaving the heirs of Gregorio as sole claimants.

Supreme Court Analysis of Res Judicata

The Supreme Court analyzed whether the Court of Appeals' previous ruling could act as res judicata in the current claim. The Court determined that while the sale by Alfredo Natividad was deemed void regarding title conveyance, the decision did not preclude the assertion of Alfredo’s rights as a legatee before formal estate settlement. The conclusion drawn from the appella

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.