Title
Cayetano vs. Monsod
Case
G.R. No. 100113
Decision Date
Sep 3, 1991
Christian Monsod's COMELEC appointment upheld; Supreme Court broadly defines "practice of law" to include legal-related activities beyond courtroom litigation.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 100113)

Constitutional Provision and Applicable Law

1987 Constitution, Art. IX-C, Sec. 1(1)
– COMELEC must be headed by a Chairman and six Commissioners, natural-born, ≥ 35 years old, college degree holders, non-candidates in preceding elections.
– A majority (including the Chairman) must be Philippine Bar members “who have been engaged in the practice of law for at least ten years.”

Defining the Practice of Law

Black’s Law Dictionary (3rd ed.)
– Encompasses all services requiring legal knowledge: litigation, pleadings, conveyancing, instrument drafting, advice.
American and Philippine cases
– Practice includes in-court advocacy and out-of-court advisory, drafting, representation before tribunals (Land Title Abstract v. Dworken; State ex rel. McKittrick v. Dudley; Phil. Lawyers Ass’n v. Agrava).
– Habituality and compensation mark practice (People v. Villanueva; People v. De Luna).

Legislative History and Framers’ Intent

1986 Constitutional Commission debates
– “Practice of law” construed liberally to include in-house legal work in agencies like COA.
– Counsel in government service using legal knowledge satisfies the ten-year requirement.

Facts of Nomination and Confirmation

– April 25, 1991: President’s letter nominating Monsod as COMELEC Chairman received by CA Secretariat.
– June 5, 1991: CA confirmed Monsod’s appointment.
– June 18, 1991: Monsod took his oath and assumed office.

Petition and Grounds

– Cayetano filed for Certiorari and Prohibition, alleging Monsod lacked the ten-year “practice of law” qualification.
– Seeks nullification of CA’s confirmation and Monsod’s appointment.

Respondent’s Professional Background

– Bar passer (1960); Integrated Bar dues paid since 1972.
– Early law office work (father’s firm); M.A. and Ph.D. work in economics (1961–63).
– 1963–70: World Bank economist and operations officer.
– 1970–86: Corporate executive roles (Meralco Group, investment banks, conglomerates).
– 1986–87: Constitutional Commissioner (Committee on Accountability).
– 1986–90: NAMFREL leadership and Davide Commission member.
– Post-1990: Legal/economic consultancy and CEO roles.

Commission on Appointments’ Findings

– CA hearings reviewed Monsod’s bar membership, professional license renewals, advisory and quasi-judicial roles.
– Implicitly concluded these combined activities satisfied “practice of law” for ten years.

Judicial Precedents on Appointment Discretion

Luego v. CSC (143 SCRA 327)
– Appointment involves discretion; if statutory qualifications are met, courts must not substitute their judgment for that of the appointing authority.
Central Bank v. CSC (171 SCRA 744)
– CSC may not refuse to attest to an appointment when qualifications are satisfied; any different action is a jurisdictional usurpation.

Court’s Analysis and Rationale

Broad Interpretation of Law Practice
– Embraces both litigation and non-litigation legal work requiring specialized




...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.