Title
Catigbac vs. Leyesa
Case
G.R. No. 18806
Decision Date
Dec 23, 1922
A dispute over 991 hectares in Batangas, involving boundary discrepancies and claims of adverse possession, dismissed due to prescription and lack of valid cause for boundary determination.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 78592)

Factual Background

The land at issue spans approximately 991 hectares, originally owned by Celestino Solis, who died in 1874. Following his death, the property was partitioned among his heirs, with specific parcels assigned to his daughters and other children. The daughters, Petra and Gliceria, received the easternmost parcel, while other heirs such as Filomena, Justa, and Germana received adjacent parcels following a specific order. Over time, the heirs and their successors established possession of their respective parcels, marked by physical boundaries like fences and monuments.

Historical Ownership and Title Issues

Each parcel was granted formal title through composition gratuita in 1881, detailing the specific areas allocated to each heir. However, discrepancies arose regarding the actual areas possessed compared to those stated in the title documents. Petitioner Catigbac discovered that he possessed only 169 hectares instead of the 230 hectares he believed he was entitled to. Meanwhile, defendants Olaguivel and Gutierrez Hermanos were found to occupy a greater area than their titles indicated.

Nature of the Action

The plaintiffs sought legal recourse through the action of deslinde y amojonamiento, aimed at establishing clear boundaries. Although not explicitly outlined in the Code of Civil Procedure, this action has historical roots in equity jurisdiction. The substantive right for such action is grounded in Article 384 of the Civil Code, which allows for the establishment of disputed boundaries.

Court Findings and Conclusion

The court determined that the plaintiffs failed to establish a cause of action for deslinde y amojonamiento, as the evidence presented reflected issues of ejectment rather than bound

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.