Case Summary (G.R. No. 96409)
Key Dates
– December 13, 1990: RA 6975 approved by the President
– December 17, 1990: RA 6975 published
– January 1, 1991: RA 6975 took effect (15 days after publication)
– December 20, 1990: Petition for declaration of unconstitutionality filed
– February 14, 1992: En banc decision rendered
Applicable Law
– 1987 Constitution, Article XVI, Section 6: “one police force, … national in scope and civilian in character, … administered and controlled by a national police commission”
– Republic Act No. 6975: Establishing the Philippine National Police under a reorganized Department of the Interior and Local Government
Historical Evolution of the Philippine Police
– Commonwealth Period: Philippine Constabulary (PC) as nucleus of the Ground Force; PC under Department of the Interior
– Post-war: PC became “National Police” under Department of National Defense and served as major AFP component
– 1975 Integration Act: Creation of Integrated National Police (INP) under the Office of the President, PC as nucleus, local police as civilian components; NAPOLCOM exercised administrative control, local executives operational supervision
– Identified defects: erosion of civilian character, multiplicity of control, inequities in benefits, inefficiency
Petitioner’s Main Contentions
- RA 6975 emasculates NAPOLCOM by limiting its power to “administrative control” and vesting “control” in the Department Secretary.
- Unauthorized transfer of operational control to local executives who choose certain PNP officers.
- Civil Service Commission’s role in appointments encroaches on NAPOLCOM authority.
- Disciplinary powers given to mayoral PLEBs dilute commission control.
- Section 12’s transition of internal security role from AFP to DILG infringes on Commander-in-Chief powers.
- Creation of a Special Oversight Committee with legislators encroaches on executive control.
Presidential Control and Doctrine of Qualified Political Agency
– The President’s power under Article VII, Section 17 extends to all executive departments, from Cabinet Secretaries to clerks.
– “Doctrine of Qualified Political Agency”: Cabinet Secretaries act as delegated agents; their acts presumptively carry out presidential control unless reversed.
– Placing NAPOLCOM and PNP under DILG is administrative realignment; NAPOLCOM retains statutory administration and control via detailed powers (e.g., approving training, appellate jurisdiction over disciplinary actions).
Participation of Local Executives
– Article XVI, Section 6 allows local executive authority “provided by law”
– RA 6975, Section 51: Governors and Mayors deputized as NAPOLCOM representatives to choose provincial directors and police chiefs from lists of eligibles recommended by PNP regional/provincial offices
– Their acts bind the Commission unless countermanded; local executives exercise operational supervision as intended by the constitutional framers to avoid abuses of unfettered local control
Role of the Civil Service Commission
– Section 31: CSC attests appointments of Police Officer I through Deputy Director-General, ensuring civilian standards and professionalization
– Section 32: CSC administers qualifying entrance exams based on NAPOLCOM standards
– These provisions underscore civilian character and professional integrity of the PNP
Disciplinary Mechanisms and People’s Law Enforcement Boards
– City/Municipal PLEBs and mayors may discipline erring officers; NAPOLCOM retains appellate jurisdiction through regional appellate boards (Section 20[c])
– NAPOLCOM issues implementing rules and may assign hearing officers to PLEBs (Section 43[d][4–5])
– PLEBs serve as citizen-complaint bodies, reinforcing professionalism without undermining NAPOLCOM control
Transition Period and Commander-in-Chief Powers
– Section 12: Twenty-four-month (extendible) transition of internal security role from AFP to DILG
– The Commission on the Constitutional Commission
Case Syllabus (G.R. No. 96409)
Constitutional Provision at Issue
- Article XVI, Section 6, 1987 Constitution: “The State shall establish and maintain one police force, which shall be national in scope and civilian in character, to be administered and controlled by a national police commission. The authority of local executives over the police units in their jurisdiction shall be provided by law.”
- Core controversy: whether RA 6975 complies with the mandate to vest administration and control of the national police in an independent police commission.
Legislative Enactment: Republic Act No. 6975
- Enacted as “AN ACT ESTABLISHING THE PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE UNDER A REORGANIZED DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.”
- Consolidated from House Bill No. 23614 and Senate Bill No. 463.
- Approved by President Corazon C. Aquino on December 13, 1990; published December 17, 1990; became effective January 1, 1991 (fifteen days after publication).
Background and Procedural History
- Petitioner, as citizen, taxpayer, and member of the Philippine Bar, filed a petition on December 20, 1990 seeking:
- Declaration of unconstitutionality of RA 6975.
- Prayer for temporary restraining order.
- December 27, 1990 en banc resolution: respondents directed to file Comment; petition not given due course.
- Act took effect January 1, 1991; petitioner sought judicial relief post-effectivity.
Historical Evolution of the Philippine Police Force
- Commonwealth period: Philippine Constabulary (PC) as nucleus of Philippine Ground Force under Department of the Interior.
- Post-war: PC remained “National Police” under Department of National Defense as AFP component.
- Integration Act of 1975 (PD 765): created Integrated National Police (INP) under Office of the President with PC as nucleus and local forces as civilian components.
- NAPOLCOM under RA 4864 (Office of the President) exercised administrative control; local executives had operational supervision.
- Criticisms: military command eroded civilian character; multiplicity of control led to inefficiency and privilege inequities.
Constitutional Commission Deliberations and Policy Rationale
- Com. Teodulo C. Natividad emphasized removal of police from military control to develop a professional civilian police.
- Universal acceptance: policing is a civilian public service.
- Draft Constitution postulate: military cannot occupy civil service positions (now Art. XVI, Sec. 5(4)).
- Resulting in mandatory “one police force, national in scope, and civilian in character” (Art. XVI, Sec. 6).
Petitioner’s Main Contentions
- RA 6975 emasculated NAPOLCOM by limiting its power to “administrative control” while vesting actual control in the Department Secretary.
- Local executives given power to choose PNP Provincial Directors and city/municipal Chiefs of Police.
- Civil Service Commission’s role in appointment and examination processes encroached on NAPOLCOM.
- Grant of disciplinary jurisdiction to People’s Law Enforcement Boards (PLEBs) and local mayors undermined NAPOLCOM’s control.
- Section 12’s twenty-four-month transition grants AFP internal-security role at expense of civ