Title
Caranto vs. Bergesen D.Y. Phils.
Case
G.R. No. 170706
Decision Date
Aug 26, 2015
Seafarer with diabetes and hypertension declared fit to work by company doctor; CA upheld partial disability award, denying higher CBA claim.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. 170706)

Employment Details

Caranto was hired on October 21, 1999, as Chief Steward/Cook aboard the vessel "M/V Berge Hus" for a period of nine months, with a monthly salary of US$877.00. He had previously entered into three separate contracts with the respondents and was a member of the Associated Marine Officers’ and Seamen’s Union of the Philippines (AMOSUP), which had a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) with the respondents.

Medical Condition and Repatriation

Prior to deployment, Caranto underwent a pre-employment medical examination, which indicated he was fit for sea service but noted a pre-existing condition of Class B diabetes controlled with medications. On December 18, 1999, while onboard, he experienced severe health complications, leading to repatriation on December 25, 1999. Following this, Caranto was examined several times by Dr. Nicomedes G. Cruz, the company-designated physician, who eventually declared him fit to work on April 7, 2000.

Second Medical Opinion and Disability Assessment

After his fitness for work was certified by Dr. Cruz, respondents arranged for Caranto to seek a second opinion from Dr. Natalia G. Alegre. Upon examination on August 31, 2000, Dr. Alegre diagnosed him with poorly controlled diabetes and hypertension, deeming him unfit for work and assigning a disability grade of 12. Caranto also consulted an independent physician, Dr. Efren R. Vicaldo, who assessed him with a partial permanent disability classified as Grade V (58.96%).

Legal Proceedings and Labor Arbiter's Decision

Caranto filed a complaint with the Labor Arbiter for disability benefits, among other claims. The Labor Arbiter rendered a decision on January 30, 2003, awarding him US$60,000.00 as permanent medical unfitness benefits under the CBA and 10% attorney's fees, citing that the lapse of over 120 days entitled him to compensation benefits.

NLRC and Court of Appeals’ Review

Respondents appealed the decision to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), which upheld the Labor Arbiter’s decision. However, upon further appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed this decision on September 9, 2005, asserting that the medical findings of Dr. Alegre should prevail over Dr. Vicaldo's assessment due to the credibility and thorough examination process followed.

Supreme Court’s Ruling

In the Supreme Court's review, the petition filed by Caranto contested the CA's conclusions, arguing that the appellate court underestimated the findings of his independent physician and misapplied the relevant laws governing seafarer employment. Ultimately, the Supreme Court upheld t

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.