Title
Capule vs. Capistrano
Case
G.R. No. 1752
Decision Date
Feb 26, 1906
Dispute over land possession between buyer and heir; plaintiff's ownership upheld, damages denied due to insufficient evidence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 1752)

Factual Background

The central issue in this case is the recovery of possession of the specified tract of land and the claim for damages due to unlawful detention of said property. Nicasio Capule argues that he rightfully purchased the land from Eduardo Capistrano before Eduardo passed away. After Eduardo's death, Evaristo, as an heir, allegedly deprived Nicasio of his rightful possession of the property.

Legal Arguments and Decisions

The primary contention raised by Evaristo Capistrano's counsel during the appeal centers around the absence of the sales document that purportedly validates Nicasio's purchase of the land. However, the appellate court determined that this argument was introduced too late as it did not appear in the previous proceedings and lacked any supporting affidavit. Furthermore, the trial court had already acknowledged the existence of the sale agreement corroborated by the testimony of four witnesses, affirming that the sale occurred.

Conclusion on Damages

The appellate court found merit in the argument that Nicasio’s claim for damages was not substantiated by sufficient evidence presented during the trial. Consequently, while the court upheld the declarative aspect of the trial court's decision affirming Nicasio's title to the property, it reversed the portion of the judgment that awarded damages to him. The final ruling directed that damages claime

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.