Title
Calo vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. L-21256
Decision Date
Sep 30, 1963
Calo and Plaza contested the 1959 Butuan mayoral election; Supreme Court ruled stray votes for "D.O. Plaza" favored Calo, declaring him winner by 34 votes.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. 233990)

Election Results and Protest

Following the election, the Board of Canvassers declared Calo the winner, with 7,464 votes compared to Plaza’s 7,278 votes, yielding a plurality of 186 votes for Calo. However, Plaza contested the results by filing an election protest on December 3, 1959, in the Court of First Instance of Agusan. The trial court later ruled in favor of Plaza, declaring him elected with 7,428 votes against Calo's 7,402, resulting in a plurality of 26 votes.

Court of Appeals Ruling

Both parties appealed the trial court’s ruling, and the Court of Appeals modified the decision, affirming Plaza's election but reducing his plurality to 5 votes. This appeal by Calo was pursued on the grounds of alleged errors committed by the Court of Appeals.

Votes Contested

A significant point of contention was the counting of ballots that indicated "D.O. Plaza" as opposed to "C. Plaza." The Court of Appeals initially deemed many of these votes valid for Plaza. However, they later conceded that if these specific ballots were considered stray votes (as they could likely refer to Democrito O. Plaza, a candidate for Governor), Calo would still win by 5 votes.

Legal Provisions Analyzed

The court referenced specific provisions from Section 149 of the Revised Election Code, particularly paragraphs 1 and 6, to analyze the validity of the ballots. The court concluded that the presence of initials along with surnames or words that closely resemble the names of another candidate, if not sufficiently distinct, renders those votes stray.

Additional Ballots Reviewed

The court identified a total of eleven ballots that had been incorrectly counted for Plaza but should have been classified as stray votes. The analysis indicated that other ballots were also marked or incorrectly talli

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.